Back
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Abdullakutty Haji, S/o. Thappy Aboobacker – Appellant
Versus
H. Mushtafa, S/o. Hussainar – Respondent
ORDER :
Kauser Edappagath, J.
The common order passed in IA No.6/2024, and the issue of maintainability of counter-claim in OS No.206/2023 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Palakkad (for short, 'the trial court') is under challenge in the above Original Petition and Civil Revision Petition.
2. I refer to the status of the parties hereunder as they are referred to in the suit, i.e., the plaintiff and the defendant.
3. The plaint schedule property comprising a shop room having a plinth area of 12,000 sq. ft situated on the ground floor of a shopping mall viz. Thappy's Mall at Court Road, Palakkad admittedly belongs to the defendant. It was taken on a license basis by the plaintiff from the defendant to run a supermarket as per the license deed executed between them on 26/4/2018 (marked as Ext.A1). The period of license was ten years w.e.f. 26/4/2018. The license fee initially agreed was Rs.3,50,000/- per month with an enhancement @5% per annum. At present, the license fee per month is Rs.3,95,000/-. There is no dispute between the parties regarding their jural relationship and the rate of license fee.
4. The plaintiff instituted the suit originally as OS No.200/2023 at the Munsiff C
The court established that disputes arising from license agreements for properties used exclusively for trade qualify as commercial disputes under the CC Act.
The court confirmed that the counter-claim is a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, emphasizing the need for clear admissions for invoking judgment on admissions.
The court confirmed the trial court's ruling that the counter-claim is a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, emphasizing the importance of clear admissions in legal proceedings.
A counter-claim related to a licensee's possession falls under the jurisdiction of the relevant authority, not a civil court, as it necessitates a substantive evaluation of the agreement's terms.
A dispute arising from an agreement to sell immovable property used for trade is a commercial dispute, mandating resolution in a Commercial Court, as clarified by statutory definitions.
Interim Application - Contract for sale - Court-fee value and jurisdictional value to be same in certain suits - When there is a reasonable doubt with respect to quantum of court fees, the benefit mu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the correct payment of court fee in a suit must be determined in accordance with settled legal principles and the specific provisions of the C....
Valuation of suit – It is nature of relief claimed in plaint which is decisive of question of suit valuation – Market value does not become decisive of suit valuation merely because an immovable prop....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
