IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, G.GIRISH, JJ.
Nazeer, S/o.Habeeb Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
Crl.A No. 485 of 2019
Decided on : 03-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
Raja Vijayaraghavan. J.
The appellant in this case, Sri. Nazeer, a fish vendor, was arrayed as the accused in S.C.No.375 of 2011 on the file of the Special Judge for the Trial of Offences Against Women and Children (Additional Sessions Judge-I), Thalassery. He has been convicted under Sections 449, 392, and 302 of the IPC for murdering for gain, his neighbour, a 65-year-old spinster. By judgment dated 29.11.2017, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh under Section 302 of the IPC and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh under Section 392 of the IPC and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.75,000/- under Section 449 of the IPC and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.
Background Facts:
2. The deceased was residing alone in the Taravad house, numbered VII/143, situated in Eranholy Panchayat. Ext.P15, the scene mahazar, provides a picture of the location and surroundings of the home of the deceased. The mahazar reveals that the house faces east, with a courtyard on the eastern side. A pathway, measuring 122 cm in width and 14 meters in length, extends eastward from the house, leading to a small water channel. Approximately 12 meters to the west, beyond the western boundary wall, is the residence of Srinivasan, a close relative of the deceased. About 50 meters to the south lies the house of Kunjalu, the mother-in-law of the appellant. The house of Pramod (PW1), the nephew of the deceased, is also nearby.
3. For 15 years prior to her death, it was the practice of the deceased to live in her house during the daytime and spend the night in the house of Pramod (PW1), the son of her sister, located nearby. Pramod, Jisha P. (PW2), and PW1’s mother would keep her company. As usual, on the morning of 31.10.2010, at approximately 7:00 a.m., the deceased left PW1's residence.
4. The prosecution alleges that between 11:30 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. on the same day, K.K. Sasi (PW6), a newly elected member of the VII Ward of Eranholy Grama Panchayat, along with Babu (CW10), visited Nalini’s house to invite her to the swearing-in ceremony scheduled for the following day. Despite calling Nalini’s name repeatedly, there was no response, though the front door was lying open. They then proceeded to the house of PW1, located nearby, and informed him that Nalini had not answered.
5. At around 12:30 p.m., PW1 went to Nalini’s house to check on her.
To his shock, he discovered Nalini lying face down on the floor. Immediately, he called Sasi and Babu by phone. He also alerted his relatives, including his wife Jisha, Kamala (PW20), and Premaja, who all rushed to Nalini’s house. They found that her clothes were soaked with urine. As Nalini had been suffering from diabetes and high blood pressure, they initially believed she had fallen unconscious due to her medical conditions. They lifted her, changed her clothes, and requested PW6 to summon a doctor.
6. While trying to remove her blouse, they noticed that Nalini’s gold chain was missing. Within ten minutes, Dr. Viswanathan (PW16), the Medical Officer, “Sreyas Hospital”, arrived at the scene. After examining Nalini, he opined that it was likely that she had died four hours before his examination. The relatives also noticed that a bangle weighing approximately one sovereign and Rs.2,000/- in cash were missing.
Registration of Crime and Investigation:
7. The police were promptly notified, and based on the information provided by PW1, Ext.P19 FIR was registered as Crime No.1253 of 2010 at Tellicherry Police Station by PW27, the Sub Inspector of Police, for offences under Sections 302 and 392 of the IPC.
8. The investigation was taken over by PW28, the Circle Inspector of Police, Thalassery. He arrived at the scene, conducted th
State of Rajasthan v. Bhup Singh
State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava
State through CBI v. Mahender Singh Dahiya
Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Makrand Singh and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Padala Veera Reddy V. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ramesh Harijan v. State of U.P.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and any reasonable doubt must benefit the accused.
In cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances and a motive for the crime to secure a conviction.
Circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain pointing solely to the guilt of the accused; confessions made in police custody are inadmissible unless they lead to the discovery of facts.
The principle that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain leading to the guilt of the accused, with no reasonable doubt remaining, was emphasized, highlighting the necessity for the prose....
(1) Murder – Proof of motive only adds to weight and value of evidence adduced by prosecution.(2) Evidence of a witness ought not be rejected only on the ground that he is a relative of injured/decea....
The necessity for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in cases relying on circumstantial evidence, and the importance of establishing a clear connection between the accused and the....
Circumstantial evidence murder conviction cannot rest on solitary unproven recovery of stolen property without complete chain; accused's probable explanation on preponderance of probability entitles ....
The court emphasized the necessity of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, finding insufficient evidence to uphold convictions for murder and robbery.
Circumstantial evidence must establish a complete chain of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with the prosecution bearing the burden of proof.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt to secure a conviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.