A. BADHARUDEEN
FISAL KHAN S/O SAINUDEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings in furtherance to Annexure-1 Final Report in Crime No. 1267/2021 of Fort Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, now pending as S.C. No. 593/2022 on the files of the Special Court for the trial of cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred as ‘POCSO Act’ for short) cases, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner herein is the 2nd accused in the above case as per the Final Report.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant, in detail. Perused the relevant materials available.
3. In this matter, though the petitioner is arrayed as the 2nd accused, while arraying the mother of the victim as the 1st accused, the narration in the charge runs on the premise that the petitioner herein is the 1st accused. The allegation of the prosecution is that, on 08.02.2021 in Room No. 151 of RP Days Inn Lodge in Kizhakkekotta, the mother of the victim and the petitioner herein, after sharing common intention, engaged in sexual
The court clarified the applicability of specific sections of IPC and POCSO Act based on the evidence of the case, distinguishing between the roles of the accused.
The absence of sexual intent in the victim's statements negated the applicability of the alleged offences under the IPC and POCSO Act.
(1) Sexual harassment of child – Settlement of POCSO offences, acting on affidavit filed by victim or their parents, is not legally permissible.(2) Mere sending of messages or having chats with a chi....
The court established that for offences under the PoCSO Act, evidence of sexual intent in communications is essential to constitute a prima facie case.
The court ruled that allegations of sexual harassment under the POCSO Act must be evaluated on evidence, even amidst claims of family rivalry, necessitating a trial.
The court ruled that mere transportation of a minor without sexual intent does not constitute offences under IPC or PoCSO Act, allowing the quashment of proceedings.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing the intent behind the actions alleged in offenses related to obscenity and insult to modesty, highlighting the need for prima facie evidence to ....
The court upheld the committal order based on prima facie evidence of aggravated sexual assault and corporal punishment under the POCSO Act and JJ Act.
Insufficient evidence led to a conviction for sexual harassment under a lesser offence rather than the initial charges of sexual assault.
The court ruled that no prima facie case existed against the accused as the victim had attained majority and voluntarily left with him, leading to the quashment of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.