SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1099

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
FISAL KHAN S/O SAINUDEEN – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl. M.C. No. 3553 of 2022
Decided On : 14-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: LIJU.
For the Respondents: AUGUSTUS BINU, M.P. PRASANTH.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court clarified the applicability of specific sections of IPC and POCSO Act based on the evidence of the case, distinguishing between the roles of the accused.

Headnote:

Quash - Criminal Proceedings - IPC Sections, POCSO Act, JJ Act - The court quashed certain charges against the petitioner while allowing others, interpreting the relevant sections to determine the applicability of offences based on the evidence presented.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, accused in a sexual offence case, sought to quash proceedings against him, arguing that the allegations did not meet the necessary legal criteria for certain charges under IPC and POCSO Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that while some charges were not substantiated, there was sufficient evidence to proceed with charges under specific sections of the IPC and POCSO Act against the petitioner.

Issues: Whether the allegations against the petitioner met the legal criteria for the offences charged under IPC and POCSO Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the evidence did not support charges under certain IPC sections but did support charges under others, particularly focusing on the definitions and requirements of the POCSO Act.

Result: The petition was allowed in part; certain charges were quashed while others were upheld for trial.

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings in furtherance to Annexure-1 Final Report in Crime No. 1267/2021 of Fort Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, now pending as S.C. No. 593/2022 on the files of the Special Court for the trial of cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred as ‘POCSO Act’ for short) cases, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner herein is the 2nd accused in the above case as per the Final Report.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant, in detail. Perused the relevant materials available.

3. In this matter, though the petitioner is arrayed as the 2nd accused, while arraying the mother of the victim as the 1st accused, the narration in the charge runs on the premise that the petitioner herein is the 1st accused. The allegation of the prosecution is that, on 08.02.2021 in Room No. 151 of RP Days Inn Lodge in Kizhakkekotta, the mother of the victim and the petitioner herein, after sharing common intention, engaged in sexual intercourse, in the presence of the victim. The allegation is that, after reaching the lodge along with the victim, minor boy aged 16 years, the minor was sent to purchase some articles. When the minor returned along with the articles, at 20.30 hours and opened the door, he happened to see that, both of them were engaged in sexual intercourse, after being naked. When, the victim questioned the same, the petitioner herein abused the minor, caught hold on his neck, beat on his cheek and kicked him down. The other accused, who is the mother of the victim also shared common intention by not restraining the petitioner from doing the said overt acts against the minor. It is on this premise, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 323 and 34 of IPC, Section 12 read with 11(i) of the POCSO Act and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act [hereinafter referred as ‘JJ Act’ for short], by accused Nos. 1 and 2.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner read out the FIS and submitted that, no ingredients to attract offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 341 of IPC as well as under Section 11(i) read with 12 of the POCSO Act, made out, as against the petitioner and the other accused. He also would submit that, Section 75 of the JJ Act also would not attract as against the petitioner, since he has no actual control or custody of the victim, in any manner. Therefore, the proceedings as against the petitioner is liable to be quashed.

5. Opposing quashment, the learned Public Prosecutor specifically pointed out that offence punishable under Section 11(i) read with 12 of the POCSO Act would attract since, sexual intercourse in naked state in between the 1st and 2nd accused was seen by the minor. He also would submit that offence under Section 323 read with 34 of IPC also is made out from the statement as well as the additional statement of the victim.

6. On perusal of the statements and additional statement of the victim, it could be seen that there is allegation that the petitioner abused the minor, caught hold on his neck, beat on his cheek and kicked him down and the specific allegation is that, the victim saw the sexual intercourse between the accused persons after being naked. Even though there is allegation of using abusive words, the words are not stated in the statements and also there is nothing stated regarding wrongful confinement.

7. Coming to Section 11(i) read with 12 of the POCSO Act, the same is as under:

    11. Sexual harassment - A person is said to commit sexual harassment upon a child when such person with sexual intent:

(i) utters any word or makes any sound, or makes any gesture or exhibits any object or part of body with the intention that such word or sound shall be hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top