IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G. ARUN, J.
xxxxxxx - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Government Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 35211 of 2024
Decided On : 25-10-2024
(A) Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – Sections 2(14) and 3 – Custody of minor child – The Child Welfare Committee found the mother unfit to care for her child, leading to custody being granted to the father – The court emphasized the need for adherence to principles of natural justice and the best interest of the child, highlighting the mother's right to breastfeed and the importance of emotional bonding – The impugned order was quashed, and custody was restored to the mother. (Paras 1, 10, 14, 17)
(B) Natural Justice – The principles of natural justice must be followed in custody determinations, ensuring fairness and opportunity for the parties involved. (Paras 11, 16)
Facts of the case: The petitioner, a lactating mother, challenged the CWC's order granting custody of her child to the father, citing harassment and her right to breastfeed. The CWC's decision was based on moral judgments rather than legal reasoning.
Findings of Court: The court found that the CWC failed to consider the mother's breastfeeding rights and did not conduct a proper inquiry before making its decision.
Issues: The main issues included the CWC's authority to determine custody when both parents are fit and the impact of the mother's breastfeeding rights on custody decisions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the CWC's decision was flawed due to a lack of adherence to natural justice and the best interest of the child, emphasizing that moral judgments should not dictate custody outcomes.
Result: Writ petition allowed; custody of the child restored to the mother.
JUDGMENT :
V.G. Arun, J.
A young lactating mother is before this Court, aggrieved by an order passed by the Child Welfare Committee (hereinafter referred to as “CWC”), finding her unfit to look after her baby aged just one year and four months and gave custody of the baby to her husband the 3rd respondent herein. The circumstances that led to the impugned order are as under;
“issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to handover the custody of the minor daughter Duva Mariam to the petitioner herein.”
2. When this writ petition came up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the baby is being breastfed by the petitioner and by reason of the impugned order, the child is deprived of mother's milk. Thereupon, this Court issued the following direction;
4. The Station House Officer, Kumily Police Station is suo motu impleaded as the additional 4th respondent. Learned Government Pleader takes notice for the additional 4th respondent.
The additional 4th respondent shall serve a copy of this order to the 3rd respondent and require him to produce the child between 10.00 am and 11.00 am every day.”
3. On receipt of notice from this Court, the 3rd respondent entered appearance and filed a counter affidavit along with a copy of order of the CWC dated 23.09.2024, containing the reasons for depriving the petitioner the custody of her baby. Thereupon, the petitioner amended the writ petition by incorporating a prayer for quashing that order (Ext.P8). A rough translation of the reasons stated in Ext.P8 order is given below;
Even though the father of the child expresses willingness to accept the child's mother if she severs her relationship with Mohammed Rafi, the lady is not prepared to do so and informed the Committee that
Shaiju S. and others v. Child Welfare Committee, Kollam and others
AI
Custody decisions must prioritize the best interest of the child and adhere to natural justice principles, ensuring that moral biases do not influence legal outcomes.
The court emphasized that custody decisions must prioritize the child's best interest and adhere to principles of natural justice, recognizing the mother's right to breastfeed as fundamental.
The welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in custody disputes, favoring biological parents despite ongoing criminal allegations.
The welfare of the child is paramount in child custody matters, and the court has parens patriae jurisdiction to ensure the child's well-being.
The court reaffirmed that the removal of a child from adoptive parents without due consideration of established bonds and legal procedures is unlawful, emphasizing the best interest of the child.
Guardians and Wards - Child in need of care and protection – Rights of children - Rights of children are protected and that broad and purposeful interpretation is given to the definition “child in ne....
Natural guardians of child have right to custody of child, but that right is not absolute and courts are expected to give paramount consideration to welfare of minor child.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.