RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., G. GIRISH
RATHEESH @ KOCHANI S/O SUKUMARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The judgment dated 3.12.2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Pathanamthitta in S.C. No. 377/2013, is under challenge in this appeal. As per the above judgment, the appellant, who is the 1st accused in the case, was charged along with two others for having committed offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 302 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC. The appellant was found guilty and was convicted for the commission of offence under section 302 of the I.P.C. and was sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay a fine Rs.1,00,000/- with a default clause. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 were acquitted of all charges.
The Prosecution case:
2. “Kachanathu Kotta” is a Dravidian temple situated at Pathanamthitta. The temple festivities are usually held in the month of February. The accused is the relative of the wife of the deceased and their residences are situated in close proximity. There was an earlier incident between the accused and the deceased which led to the registration of a crime at the instance of the accused against the deceased, his son, and others. The relationship between the two persons was therefore in a strained state. The prosecution case is that, due to prior en
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay
Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam v. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Uttarakhand v. Sachendra Singh Rawat
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness accounts and a reliable dying declaration, establishing the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Murder – Non-examination of Doctor who conducted autopsy on dead body of deceased and who prepared post-mortem report is not fatal to case of prosecution.
The court relied on oral and documentary evidence to establish the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.
A conviction based on circumstantial evidence must establish clear links and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; the reliability of dying declarations is paramount.
(1) Dying declaration – For a statement to be termed dying declaration, circumstances discussed/disclosed therein must have some proximate relation to actual occurrence – If a dying declaration inspi....
The court held that a dying declaration requires corroboration and careful scrutiny to establish reliability, particularly when inconsistencies with medical evidence arise.
Dying declarations can alone sustain a conviction if deemed reliable and made in a fit state of mind, without corroborative evidence being strictly necessary.
A dying declaration can be oral or in writing and in any adequate method of communication whether by words or by signs or otherwise will suffice provided indication is positive and definite.
The dying declaration of the deceased was found to be trustworthy and reliable, leading to the appellants' conviction under Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Dying declarations can serve as the sole basis for conviction if found credible, with no strict requirement for corroboration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.