Back
M. B. SNEHALATHA
SARATH C. S/O RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
MUTHOOT LEASING & FINANCE LTD. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Revision Petitioner is the accused in S.T. No. 4012/2013 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ottappalam and he is the appellant in Crl. Appeal No. 404/2014 of Sessions Court, Palakkad. In this revision, he assails the judgment of conviction and order of sentence against him for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N.I. Act’)
2. The parties shall be referred to as complainant and accused as shown in S.T. No. 4012/2013.
3. The case of the complainant ‘Muthoot Leasing and Finance Ltd.’ is that on 06.04.2006, the accused stood as a guarantor for a vehicle loan of Rs. 3,78,000/- availed by his brother Aneesh from its branch at Palakkad and issued postdated cheques for the repayment of the loan in monthly instalments. But the said cheques issued by the accused were dishonoured one by one. When the complainant intimated the said fact to the accused, he issued Ext.P2 cheque dated 07.02.2009, for an amount of Rs. 3,90,000/- drawn on Canara Bank, Ottappalam branch, towards repayment of the balance loan amount with interest. Though the complainant presented Ext.P2 cheque for encashment, it was also bounced stating
A cheque issued as a guarantor for a loan is presumed to be in discharge of a debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and evasion of notice constitutes effective service.
Proper service of notice under S.138 occurs when sent by registered post, and dismissal of appeal upheld as complaint was filed late.
Revisional jurisdiction limited to perversity; presumption under Sections 118/139 NI Act on cheque admission; security cheque liable if debt subsists; unclaimed notice deemed served; post-dishonour r....
Presumption under NI Act S.139 arises on cheque issuance admission; rebuttable by preponderance via evidence, not S.313 statement. Security cheques liable if debt unpaid; 'account closed' dishonour a....
The presumption of liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act is upheld unless conclusively disproven by the accused.
The court upheld that a dishonored cheque creates a presumption of liability unless adequately rebutted, reinforcing the legal principles under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The determination of the date of receipt of notice and the commencement of the statutory period for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act.
Proper service of notice under Section 138 is crucial, but if sent to the last known address, it is deemed sufficient, maintaining the presumption in favor of the complainant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
