SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1252

Preetha, D/o. Rajam – Appellant
Versus
Hareesh Kumar, S/o Rajan Achari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : THOMAS ABRAHAM, ASWIN.P.JOHN, R.ANANTHAPADMANABAN, PAUL BABY

JUDGMENT :

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.

We commence being fully apprised that the legal issues qua Order VI, Rule 16, read with Section 151, of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C), apropos of the striking off pleadings of litigants, have been declared affirmatively by a learned bench of this Court in Shafi and Another v. Raihanath [2018 (3) KLT 437].

2. The learned Bench interpretatively has held-to which we fully affirm-that:

    “1. Striking off the defence is a drastic action especially in proceedings relating to matrimonial disputes. An order striking off the defence has tremendous impact on the fate of the litigation and the rights of the parties. It renders the party defenceless.

    12. The power of the Court under O.6 R.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') to strike out the defence can be exercised only in the specific circumstances mentioned therein. Unless any of the circumstances which are referred to in O.6 R.16 of the Code are present, the Court cannot strike off the defence in exercise of the power under that provision. But, outside the provisions contained O.6 R.16 of the Code, the Court has inherent power to strike off defence. A Court is mea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top