Back
Radhamma – Appellant
Versus
V. Sasidharan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant appeals against money judgment for dishonoured cheques. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant's argument on cheques as security for property transaction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and assessment of credibility. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court dismisses appeal; trial court's conclusions upheld. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
SATHISH NINAN, J.
1. The defendant in a suit for money under dishonoured cheques is in appeal against the decree.
2. According to the plaintiff, on 24.08.2001 the defendant borrowed an amount of D 11 Lakhs from him. The amount was agreed to be repaid in two months. Since the amount was not returned within the time as agreed, as required by the plaintiff, the defendant issued Exts A1 and A2 cheques dated 18.11.2001 for D 6 Lakhs and D 5 Lakhs respectively. The cheques when presented for payment were dishonoured. Accordingly, the suit was laid.
3. The defendant contended that he was the mediator in respect of a property transaction between the plaintiff and one Dr. Roy. The plaintiff had agreed to sell 24.5 cents of property to the said Dr. Roy for an amount of D 62 Lakhs within a period of six months. Out of the total sale consideration,
The court affirmed that a suit based on a dishonoured cheque is valid under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, requiring proof of the original transaction.
The court ruled on the erroneous burden of proof and misinterpretation of evidence regarding a dishonored cheque, impacting the enforceability of monetary claims.
Point of law :Negotiable Instruments - An unimpeachable claim had been made out by the plaintiff which required the defendant to furnish security. An order for attachment before judgment or security ....
The crucial consideration is whether at the time of presentation of the cheque for encashment, there was a legally enforceable debt or liability due to the complainant from the accused. The nomenclat....
An admission of signature on a negotiable instrument creates a legal presumption of consideration, which must be rebutted effectively by the defendant.
Where the instrument has been obtained from its lawful owner, or from any person in lawful custody thereof, by means of an offence or fraud, or has been obtained from the maker or acceptor thereof by....
A cheque issued as security can be presented for payment if the loan is not repaid within the stipulated time, affirming liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
