Sreedharan – Appellant
Versus
Ahsa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
1. This appeal was preferred by the husband, who was unsuccessful before the Family Court, to obtain divorce on the grounds of cruelty.
2. The marriage between the parties was on 29.01.2002 in accordance with the Hindu religious rites and ceremonies. Two children were born in wedlock. The children are now major. The Appellant-husband was in Muscat and now came down to India and settled. The allegation of cruelty has been narrated in the pleadings. The appellant alleges that the respondent-wife hails from a poor family and was more interested in extracting money from him. It is submitted that the entire money sent by him from Muscat was misused and even the money sent for construction of house was squandered away. The appellant also alleged that the respondent had an illicit relationship with the husband of her sister. The neglect and apathy towards him are one of the cruelty alleged in the petition for divorce. The appellant-husband also claimed that differences in the family emerged when a dispute arose between the respondent's family with the widow of respondent's brother namely, Anitha, as the appellant supported the case of Anitha. The respondent
Withholding mutual consent in a failed marriage constitutes cruelty under modern divorce jurisprudence.
(1) Repeatedly filing of criminal cases by one party against other in a matrimonial matter would amount to cruelty.(2) A marriage which has broken down irretrievably, spells cruelty to both parties –....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of irretrievable breakdown of marriage, a decree of divorce can be granted, and the court can consider the concept of irretrievable b....
The court established that mental cruelty, as defined under the Hindu Marriage Act, can justify the dissolution of marriage when one party experiences persistent emotional distress due to the other's....
Irretrievable breakdown of marriage and mental cruelty are valid grounds for granting divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The recognition of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the need for legislative action to amend the Act to incorporate this ground.
The court recognized the irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a valid basis for divorce, despite the absence of explicit statutory provisions for such a ground.
Divorce – A dead marriage must be given a decent quietus and continuance of such marriage runs contrary to ethos of matrimonial harmony envisioned by law.
A decree of divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act requires substantial evidence of cruelty or desertion, which must not rely solely on allegations, while recognizing irretrievable breakdown as a basis....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.