IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, EASWARAN S., JJ.
M/S. CARGO CARE INTERNATIONAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, COCHIN – Respondent
CUS. APPEAL No. 8 of 2024
Decided On : 02-12-2024
(A) Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 - Regulations 10(d), 16(1), and 17(1) - Appeal against revocation of customs broker license - License was suspended for violation of regulations, but revocation was set aside by Tribunal while upholding penalty and forfeiture of deposit - Court found no merit in arguments regarding limitation and verification obligations. (Paras 8, 12, 15, and 16)
(B) Judicial construction of regulations - The court held that the period for issuing notice under Regulation 17(1) is directory, and failure to adhere does not invalidate the proceedings. (Paras 13 and 14)
Facts of the case:
The appellant, a licensed customs broker, faced suspension and revocation of license due to failure to verify exporter identity and involvement in prohibited export activities. The proceedings were initiated following a DRI report.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to set aside the revocation while confirming the penalty and forfeiture of the security deposit.
Issues: The main issues included the timeliness of the revocation proceedings and the obligation of the customs broker to verify exporter details.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the provisions regarding the issuance of a notice under Regulation 17(1) are directory, and the customs broker has an obligation to verify exporter identity.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant, a Customs Broker and a holder of regular licence issued under Regulation 9(1) of the Custom House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004 has come up with the present appeal challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, by which the order revoking the license is set aside, however the forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty is upheld.
2. Succinctly, the facts in brief are as follows:
3. The appellant approached this Court in WP (C) No. 14202/2022 and by judgment dated 20.6.2022, a learned Single Judge of this Court set aside the order and directed the authorities to reconsider the issue. Pertinently, this Court ordered the suspension to continue till a fresh decision is taken by the respondent as directed by this Court. In pursuance to the directions contained in the Judgment dated 20.6.2022 in WP (C) No. 14202/2022, the Commissioner of Customs proceeded to pass order dated 1.7.2022, by which the decision to suspend the licence under Regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, was affirmed. The said order was again questioned before this Court in WP (C) No. 22501/2022. A learned Single Judge of this Court issued an interim order dated 29.8.2022 staying the operation of order dated 1.7.2022. It was, however, made clear that the order will not prohibit continuation/culmination of proceedings initiated against the appellant.
4. While so, on 13.9.2022 a show cause notice was issued in exercise of the power conferred under Regulation 17 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, requiring the appellant to show cause as to why the licence shall not be revoked permanently. Along with the notice to show cause, a report dated 23.3.2022 from the Superintendent of Customs and also an offence report dated 1.9.2022 by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs were enclosed and the explanation of the appellant was solicited. In the light of the aforesaid show cause notice, WP (C) No. 22501/2022 was disposed of by this Court with a direction to the authorities to complete the proceedings within a period of three months and till
AI
The period for issuing notice under Regulation 17(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations is directory, and customs brokers must verify exporter identities.
The court ruled that penalties against customs brokers must be based on clear evidence of misconduct, not mere assumptions.
Customs Brokers must exercise due diligence and cannot solely rely on client declarations; repeated violations warrant suspension of license.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.