Back
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANTHAMMA M. G. W/O LATE SREEDHARAN NAIR – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J.
1. The 3rd respondent in OP (MV) 165/2012 is the appellant herein. The respondents are petitioners 1 to 3 and respondents 1 and 2 in the OP are the respondents. (For the purpose of convenience, the parties are hereafter referred to, as per their rank before the Tribunal).
2. The petitioners filed the above OP under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation on account of the death of Lineesh T.S. in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 16.1.2008. According to the petitioners on 16.1.2008 at about 01.00 hrs. the deceased was travelling in jeep bearing registration No. KED-2260 driven by the 1st respondent from Manjeri to Thamarassery and when the jeep reached at the place of occurrence, the 1st respondent stopped the jeep at the request of Lineesh for passing urine. Thereafter when Lineesh tried to enter into the jeep and he stepped into the foot-board, the 1st respondent took the vehicle forward, in a rash and negligent manner and as a result of which, Lineesh fell down from the jeep, sustained grievous head injuries and while under treatment, he succumbed to the injuries. According to the petitioners, the accident occurred
A person attempting to board a private vehicle does not attain passenger status and is considered a third party, allowing claims for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of liability to pay compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing the need for the Insurance Company to prove the violat....
Insurers are not liable for gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles under the old Motor Vehicles Act provisions, as clarified by the Supreme Court.
Point of Law : Insurance Company was directed to pay compensation even for gratuitous passenger considering circumstances of this case under the “Doctrine of Pay and Recover” from the driver and owne....
Proof of negligence is essential for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act; failure to establish liability leads to denial of claims.
Insurers are not liable for injuries to gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles under the M.V. Act, as established by the Supreme Court.
Unauthorized passengers in goods vehicles are excluded from insurance coverage under statutory provisions, establishing limits on insurer liability.
The liability of the insurer under a statutory policy is restricted to indemnify the insured in respect of claims made by third parties and the owner of goods or their authorized representatives who ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
