C. S. SUDHA
Sukesh, S/o Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.S.Sudha, J.
In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., the appellant who is the accused in S.C.No.1070/2012 on the file of the Court of Session, Kasaragod challenges the conviction entered and sentence passed against him for the offence punishable under Section 8(2) of the Abkari Act, 1 of 1077 (the Act).
2. The prosecution case is that on 27/12/2011 at about 06:45 p.m. the accused was found in possession of 15 bottles of 'John Bull Whisky' manufactured in Karnataka with each bottle having a capacity of 180ml. The accused was also found in possession of 21 plastic bottles of 'Honey Guide Brandy', each bottle having a capacity of 90ml each, which liquor was manufactured in Goa. The accused was found in possession of the aforesaid quantity of Indian made foreign liquor for sale. The place of occurrence is the courtyard of his house bearing no.XIII/232(VI/331) of Delampady Grama Panchayath, Ponoram, Adhur village. Hence, the accused as per the final report/charge sheet was alleged to have committed the offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Act.
3. Crime no.477/2011, Adhur police station, that is, Ext.P4 FIR was registered by PW1, the Sub Inspector of Police, A
The prosecution's failure to comply with mandatory statutory provisions regarding inventory preparation and certification leads to the acquittal of the accused.
Failure to comply with statutory requirements for inventory preparation and certification under the Kerala Abkari Act undermines the prosecution's case, leading to acquittal.
Failure to comply with statutory requirements for inventory preparation and certification under the Kerala Abkari Act undermines the prosecution's case, leading to acquittal.
Defects in evidence documentation undermine a conviction under the Abkari Act, justifying acquittal.
Under Sec.53A(i), in order to ensure that Court can safely base their conviction, inventory should be prepared strictly in accordance with requirements of Sec.53A(2).
The mandatory requirements under Section 53A of the Abkari Act for disposal of seized articles and the certified inventory list as the primary evidence of the offence.
Procedural lapses in evidence collection negate conviction under the Abkari Act.
Conviction set aside - Prosecution in a case of this nature can succeed only if it is proved that the sample which was analysed in the Chemical Examiner's laboratory was the very same sample which wa....
The judgment emphasizes the necessity of adhering to correct procedural protocols in criminal investigations, particularly in evidential matters, to safeguard defendants' rights.
The conviction under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act was set aside due to prosecution's failure to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt based on procedural violations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.