SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 61

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J.
Vipin P.G. S/o Gopalan M. - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
WP(C) NO.36871 OF 2024
Decided On : 31-01-2025

Advocates appeared:
P.JINISH PAUL ASWINI S.(K/2870/2023), SNEHA V., T.C.KRISHNA, GP-SMT. VIDHYA KURIAKOSE, AMICUS CURIAE - SRI.THOMAS C.ABRAHAM

IMPORTANT POINT
The court ruled that marriages solemnized outside India involving an Indian citizen must be registered under the Foreign Marriage Act, not the Special Marriage Act.

Headnote:

(A) Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 - Registration of marriage solemnized outside India - Petitioners, an Indian citizen and an Indonesian citizen, sought registration of their marriage under the Special Marriage Act after solemnization in Indonesia - The court held that the petitioners cannot register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act as it is governed by the Foreign Marriage Act - The petitioners are permitted to apply for registration under the Foreign Marriage Act through online means. (Paras 2 , 12 , 17 )

(B) Jurisdiction of Marriage Officer - The court reiterated that the Registering Authority under the Special Marriage Act cannot refuse to solemnize marriage through online mode, outlining procedural frameworks for such cases. (Paras 16 , 17 )

Facts of the case: The petitioners married in Indonesia and sought registration under the Special Marriage Act, but the Marriage Officer sought clarification, leading to the writ petition.

Findings of Court: The court found that the petitioners are precluded from registering their marriage under the Special Marriage Act and directed them to apply under the Foreign Marriage Act instead.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners could register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act after solemnization abroad.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Special Marriage Act does not apply to marriages solemnized outside India under the Foreign Marriage Act, and the petitioners should follow the latter for registration.

Result: The petitioners' prayer to register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act is declined.

JUDGMENT

Is it permissible to register a marriage solemnized outside India between an Indian citizen and a foreign national under the Special Marriage Act?

2. The 1 st petitioner, an Indian citizen, married the 2 nd petitioner, an Indonesian citizen, on 01.02.2014 at the office of the Religious Affairs Republic, Jakarta, Indonesia. They have a child born in their wedlock. Currently, the petitioners are residing in Poomangalam Grama Panchayath, Thrissur. To formally recognise their marriage, the petitioners have submitted Ext.P3 joint application before the Marriage Officer (the 3 rd respondent) to register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act. Instead of registering the marriage, the 3 rd respondent has sought for a clarification from the District Marriage Officer. Regrettably, the 2 nd respondent has not responded to the inquiry. The petitioners have fulfilled all the conditions stipulated under the Special Marriage Act. The refusal on the part of the respondents to register the petitioners’ marriage is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition.

3. Heard; Sri. Jinish Paul, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Smt.Vidya Kuriakose, the learned Government Pleader, Sri. T.C. Krishna, the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India and Sri.Thomas C.Abraham, the learned Amicus Curiae.

4. Ext.P1 marriage certificate proves that the petitioners' marriage was solemnised according to the civil laws of Indonesia. The petitioners now desire to get their marriage registered as per the provisions of the Special Marriage Act.

5. The preamble of the Special Marriage Act states that it is an Act to provide a special form of marriage in certain cases and for registration of such and certain other marriages and for divorce. Furthermore, Sub-Section (2) of Section 1 of the Act states that the Act applies to the whole of India and to the citizens of India domiciled in the territories to which the Act extends. Chapter II of the Act delineates the procedure for the solemnisation of special marriages, and Chapter III lays down the procedure for the registration of marriages celebrated in other forms.

6. It is pertinent for the case at hand to juxtapose the provisions of the Special Marriage Act with that of the Foreign Marriage Act.

7. The preamble of the Foreign Marriage Act, 1969, reads as follows:

    “An Act to make provision relating to marriage of citizens of India outside Indiaâ€.

8. Section 2(c) of the Foreign Marriage Act defines a foreign country as a country or place outside India. Likewise, Sections 17, 23, and 24 of the said Act deal with the registration of foreign marriages solemnized under other laws, the recognition of marriages solemnized under the law of other countries, and the certification of documents of marriages solemnized in accordance with local law in a foreign country, respectively.

9. On a comparison of the provisions of the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act, it is apparent that a marriage between parties, of whom at least one is a citizen of India, can be solemnised and/or registered or certified before a Marriage Officer in a foreign country under the provisions of the Foreign Marriage Act and a marriage between two persons can be solemnised and/or registered in India under the provisions of the Special Marriage Act.

10. While considering the validity of a marriage performed in a foreign country, a Bench of this Court in Gracy and others v. P.A.Mathiri and others (2005 KHC 948) has held as follows:

    “3. The Foreign Marriage Act generally covers the marriages performed abroad where one of the parties alone is an Indian citizen. The Act covers mainly four types of factual situations; (1) the marriage solemnized before the Marriage Officer appointed by the Government of India in the foreign country, in accordance w


        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top