SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 174

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, P. KRISHNA KUMAR
ASHRAF M. A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : P.M. PAREETH, AISWARYA VENUGOPAL, NAJEEB P.S.
For the Respondent: A.J. VARGHESE

JUDGMENT :

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

1. The learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued in regard to the competency of the Deputy Director of Education in exercising the power under Chapter III of Rule 7 of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 (for short KER, 1959), which refers to the power of the Director to disqualify a Manager in the event of mismanagement. In the KER, 1959 as originally stood as ‘Director’ is defined under Rule 2 (4) as follows:

    “2(4) “Director” means the Director of Public Instruction, Kerala or such Other Officer or Officers who may from time to time be appointed by the Government to exercise all or any of the powers of the Director of Public Instruction.”

    Which means the Government is competent to appoint any officer from time to time as a Director invoking power under Rule 2(4) of the KER. As per G.O. (P) No. 52/80/G.Edn. dated 7.5.2018, the Government appointed the Deputy Director of Education as the Director for the purpose of Rule 7 of Chapter III of the KER. It is appropriate to refer to S.R.O. No. 561/80, which reads thus:

    “S.R.O. No. 561/80 - Under Clause (4) of rule 2 of Chapter I of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 and in super-session of the Notifica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top