IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
HDFC BANK STAFF UNION, KOCHI – Petitioner
Versus
BANKING OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 40192 of 2018
Decided On : 17-12-2024
JUDGMENT :
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
1. Petitioner is stated to be a registered Trade Union representing the employees of the 2nd respondent Bank. The petitioner sought to open an account with the 3rd respondent Branch of the 2nd respondent Bank and since there was delay in processing the request for opening the Bank account, a complaint was filed before the 1st respondent herein, as evidenced by Ext.P6 dated 27.04.2018. In response to Ext.P6, the 2nd respondent submitted Ext.P7 reply dated 31.05.2018 before the 1st respondent herein pointing out that the account cannot be permitted to be opened since the petitioner is seeking opening of account in the name of “HDFC Bank Staff Union” which would amount to an infringement of its registered trade mark. The petitioner submitted Ext.P10 rejoinder dated 13.06.2018 essentially pointing out that it is neither a trader/manufacturer/service provider functioning in competition with the 2nd respondent herein and, therefore, there is no violation of the provisions of the Trade Marks Act. However, by Ext.P1 communication dated 17.07.2018, the 1st respondent informed the petitioner that its complaint could not be entertained.
2. Though an appeal was filed before the Reserve Bank of India by Ext.P12, the afore appeal was rejected holding that no appeal lies against the order at Ext.P1.
3. It is in the afore circumstances that the captioned writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P1 issued by the 1st respondent and also seeking a direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents to open the account in the name of the petitioner as applied for by it.
4. I have heard Advocate Josna C.F. representing Sri. V.K. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Saji Varghese, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent Bank.
5. The challenge in this writ petition is essentially with reference to the findings in Ext.P1 issued by the 1st respondent. The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner is a registered Trade Union representing the employees of the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent, on the other hand, is a banking company engaged in banking/financial/monetary activities. The application for opening a bank account in the name of the petitioner Union is resisted by the 2nd respondent with reference to the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, contending that it had already obtained registration under the afore Statute as regards the trademark, as evidenced by Ext.P7(A). The registration, as above, is obtained by the 2nd respondent under Section 23 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Chapter IV of the afore Act lays down the effect of obtaining a registration. Section 28 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, provides for the rights conferred on account of the registration in the following terms:
(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the registration of a trade mark shall, if valid, give to the registered proprietor of the trade mark the exclusive right to the use of the trade mark in relation to the goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered and to obtain relief in respect of infringement of the trade mark in the manner provided by this Act.”
A reading of the afore provision would show that on account of a registered trade mark, the 2nd respondent gains the exclusive right to use the same in relation to “goods/services” in respect to which the trade mark is registered. As already noticed, the 2nd respondent has obtained registration for the activities noted in Ext.P7(A) registration and there is no case for the 2nd respondent that the petitioner is engaged in any of the afore activities noticed in Ext.P7(A).
6. The 2nd respondent also relies on the provisions of Section 29 of the Act, which read as under:
(1) A registered trade mark is infringed by a person who, not being a registered proprietor or a person using by way of permitted use, uses in the course of trade, a mark which is
A Trade Union is not engaged in trade, thus provisions of the Trade Marks Act regarding infringement do not apply.
The court allowed the amendments to the plaint to include other series of trade marks associated with 'RASNA' in the suit, finding that it did not change the nature of the suit and was justified to a....
The trial court must assess only the prima facie tenability of claims regarding trademark validity under Section 124, without delving into the merits of those claims.
Registration of a trademark may be cancelled if it is found to be deceptively similar to a prior registered mark and has not been used for five years, reflecting both private and public interest.
The prior user of a trademark holds exclusive rights, and similarity in name constitutes a bar against adoption by a subsequent user.
The court established that a composite trade mark must be assessed as a whole for registration, not in parts, and that refusal based on descriptiveness must consider the entirety of the mark.
Prior use and registration of a trademark are essential for establishing rights and preventing consumer confusion in trademark disputes.
In trademark infringement actions, a presumption of confusion arises if the defendant's mark is identical to that of the registered trademark, fostering the entitlement to interim injunction.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of prior user and registration of a trade mark, likelihood of confusion due to similarity, and the lack of evidence to prove a te....
The main legal point established is that the rejection of a trademark application based on lack of distinctiveness should be supported by sustainable facts and law, and the applicant should be given ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.