JUDGMENT :

Ziyad Rahman A.A., J.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in completing the process of changing the description of the petitioner’s property in the revenue records consequent to the order passed in Form-A, despite the order passed in Form-I application submitted by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.

2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of 3.64 Ares of property comprised in Re-Survey No.457/1-7 in Block No.6 of Kurichithanam Village, Meenachil Taluk. As the property was described as paddy land, the petitioner submitted an application seeking permission to use the said property for residential purposes. The said application was considered as per Ext.P2 by which he was granted permission in this regard. Thereafter, the petitioner completed the construction and later approached the authorities concerned for reassessing the property for the purpose of tax. Ext.P5 application was submitted in Form-A, for the said purpose and after processing the same, Ext.P8, Form-B was issued by the Tahsildar, Land Records, 3rd respondent herein, directing to provisionally assessing the pro