SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 239

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN
..... – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BY ADV Rajendran T.G
SMT NEEMA T V, SR. PP.

.JUDGMENT

P.V.BALAKRISHNAN, J

This appeal is filed by the sole accused in SC No.170/2017, challenging his conviction under Sections 452 , 376(2)(f),(n)&(i) and 506(ii) of IPC and Sections 5(l)&(n) r/w Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ('POCSO Act' for short) and sentence imposed under the afore IPC provisions by the Special Court for trial of offences under POCSO Act and Children’s Court, Kalpetta.

2. The prosecution case is that on 5/3/2017 at about 10.15 pm, the accused, who is a close relative of the victim (PW2) aged 15 years, criminally trespassed into her house situated in Oorukandy Paniya Colony and took her to a shed nearby and committed rape/aggravated penetrative sexual assault upon her. Thereafter, on 15/3/2017 at about 12 am, inside the house of the accused situated in Mundavara, the accused after threatening and intimidating her, again committed rape/aggravated sexual assault upon her.

3. In the trial court, from the side of the prosecution, PW1 to PW16 were examined and Exhibits P1 to P24 documents and MO1 and MO2 were marked. On examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the accused denied all the incriminating circumstances ap


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top