Back
M. A. ABDUL HAKHIM
Sethulakshmy W/o Cheruparambil Vadakkumpattu Vasu – Appellant
Versus
Sarojini W/o Kaveetil Kunjumon – Respondent
JUDGMENT
RSA No.1334/2011
1. The question involved in this Regular Second Appeal is whether the Servient owner has right to seek for shifting of easement to another part of the Servient Heritage for the convenient use of the Servient Heritage, in view of Section 22 of the Indian Easement Act, 1882 .
2. The appellant is the 1 st plaintiff in the suit. The second plaintiff is her son. They are the owners of the Servient Heritage. The defendants are the owners of Dominant Heritage, having right of way through Servient Heritage from the main road situated on the eastern boundary of Servient Heritage. The Dominant heritage is having an extent of 10 cents which is situated in the middle of Servient Heritage having an extent of 1.15 acres. Dominant Heritage is surrounded by Servient Heritage on its eastern, western and southern sides. Servient Heritage is assigned to the predecessor of the defendants - Kurumba from the plaintiffs by way of Kudikdappu. Excluding Dominant Heritage, the Servient Heritage has 1.05 acres of land, which is the plaint A schedule property. The way to the Dominant Heritage is through the middle of the eastern part of the Servient Heritage. According to the plai
The servient owner may seek to shift an easement to a more convenient part of their property without detriment to the dominant owner, as per Section 22 of the Indian Easement Act.
Easement rights under the Indian Easements Act require proof of continuous use and previous single ownership; failure to establish these elements results in dismissal of claims.
Establishment of easement rights requires explicit documentation, and mere permissive rights do not confer legal easements; plaintiffs failed to prove their claim.
Point of Law : Easementary right – The right of every owner of upper land that water naturally rising, or falling on such land, and not passing in defined channels, shall be allowed by the owner of a....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 22 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 and its influence on the court's decision regarding the existence and use of ....
The court determined that easementary rights granted in a sale deed are valid and enforceable, overruling lower court findings based on misinterpretation of evidence.
The court affirmed the Plaintiffs' easementary rights based on historical use and legal documentation, emphasizing the significance of such rights in property law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
