SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 632

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J.
Wilson K. John S/o Yohannan K.V. - Petitioner 
Versus
The Joint Secretary, Industries Department, Thiruvananthapuram - Respondent 
W.P. (C) Nos. 12684, 13596, 32704 of 2024
Decided On : 10-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : BY ADVS. SRI PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL SRI ABRAHAM VAKKANAL (SR.) MS. VINEETHA SUSAN THOMAS
For the Respondent: BY ADVS. SRI P.M.ZIRAJ SRI GEORGE ABRAHAM SRI JIBU P THOMAS SRI JOBY D JOSEPH(K/000093/2019) MS.MARY CATHERINE PRIYANKA P.S.(K/319/2015) SRI IRFAN ZIRAJ SRI M.P.SREEKRISHNAN (SC) SRI T.NAVEEN (SC) SRI P.S.APPU, GOVT.PLEADER SRI K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN

IMPORTANT POINT
The court ruled that quarrying permits issued without valid Environmental Clearance are invalid, emphasizing that all excavation activities must comply with Environmental Protection Act requirements.

Headnote:

(A) Environmental Protection Act, 1986 - Section 3 - Environmental Clearance (EC) - Writ petitions challenging quarrying permits issued without valid EC - Supreme Court's judgment in Noble M. Paikada case declared Entry 6 of EIA notification arbitrary and illegal - Petitioners argue that concessionaires must obtain EC for quarrying activities - Court finds that quarrying permits are non est due to lack of valid EC. (Paras 4 , 10 , 18 , 26 )

(B) Environmental Clearance Requirement - The court emphasized that the exemption for quarrying activities under Entry 6 does not extend to concessionaires and that all excavation activities must comply with EC requirements. (Paras 18 , 26 )

(C) Clarificatory Orders - The court clarified that the Supreme Court's orders regarding EC apply only to the NHAI and not to subcontractors or concessionaires. (Paras 18 , 26 )

Facts of the case:

The petitioners, residents of various Panchayats, challenged the legality of quarrying permits issued to concessionaires for mining ordinary earth without valid EC, citing the Supreme Court's ruling that such activities require prior clearance.

Findings of Court:

The court quashed the quarrying permits issued without valid EC and directed that no excavation activities be conducted without obtaining the necessary clearance.

Issues: The main issue was whether concessionaires are required to obtain EC for quarrying ordinary earth for highway projects.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Supreme Court's ruling invalidated the blanket exemption for quarrying activities and mandated that all such activities must comply with EC requirements.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; quarrying permits quashed.

JUDGMENT :

T.R. RAVI, J.

W.P.(C)No.12684 of 2024 has been filed with the following prayers :-

“i. Issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Exhibits P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5, in the light of the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ext.P8 judgment ;

ii. Declare that Exhibit P1 to P5 permits issued to respondents 4 to 8 are non est and void in law, as they have no valid EC, in the light of Ext.P8 judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court ;

iii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 & 2 to conduct a detailed enquiry and assessment pertaining to the quarrying/mining done by respondents 4 to 8 under the guise of the Ext.P1 to P5 permits and appropriate actions should be initiated against the erring respondents 4 to 8 for the excessive and illegal mining done by them;

iv. Petitioners also pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the Vernacular Language ;

v. Grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper to be granted on the facts and circumstances of this case”.

2. W.P.(C) No.13596 of 2024 has been filed with the following prayers :-

“i. To issue a Writ of certiorari quashing Ext.P1 in the light of the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ext.P4 judgment ;

ii. To issue a declaration that Ext.P1 permit issued to the 8th respondent is non est and void in law, as they have no valid EC in the light of Ext.P4 judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court ;

iii. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the interest of justice, including costs”.

3. W.P.(C) No.32704 of 2024 has been filed with the following prayers :-

“i. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 7 to ensure that no sort of excavation/mining/ quarrying of ordinary earth or any activities relating thereto is permitted to be commenced or continued by respondents 8 to 14 in the properties comprised in — (a) Property of Sri. Paul Jacob (R9) - admeasuring 2.28 acres (92.27 ares) comprised in Sy.No.969/4 and 969/9A-3 having TP No.3477 of Memmury Village, Pampakuda Kara, Ernakulam District located13 in Ward No.2 of Pampakuda Grama Panchayath; (b) Property of Sri. Paul Jacob (R9) & Smt. Mary Paul (R10) - admeasuring 3.24 acres (1.31.22 hectares) comprised in Sy.No.962/1-2-2, 962/1-3-3, 962/1-1- 2, 962/1-2-2-2, having TP No.10645 and 10681 of Memmury Village, Pampakuda Kara, Ernakulam District located in Ward No.3 of Pampakuda Grama Panchayath; (c) Property of Smt. Thankamma Abraham (R11), admeasuring 2.24 acres (94.69 ares) comprised in Sy.No.594/1-3 of Onakkoor Village, Piramadom Kara, Ernakulam District located in Ward No.4 of Pampakuda Grama Panchayath; (d) Property of Smt. Leelamma Paulose (R12), admeasuring 2.23 acres (94.29 ares) comprised in Sy.No.594/1-3-2 of Onakkoor Village, Piramadom Kara, Ernakulam District located in Ward No.4 of Pampakuda Grama Panchayath; (e) Property of Smt. Ammini George (R13), admeasuring 2.23 acres (94.29 ares) comprised in Sy.No.594/1-3-4 of Onakkoor Village, Piramadom Kara, Ernakulam District located in Ward No.4 of Pampakuda Grama Panchayath; and (f) Property of Smt. Alice Baby (R14), admeasuring 2 acres (80.94 ares) comprised in Sy.No.594/1-3-3 of Onakkoor Village, Piramadom Kara, Ernakulam District located in Ward No.4 of Pampakuda Grama Panchayath; without a valid Environmental Clearance from the SEIAA (R1), in the light of Ext.P10 judgment and Ext.P11 order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court ;

ii. Declare that no sort of excavation/mining/quarrying of ordinary earth or any activities relating thereto can be undertaken/commenced or continued in the properties comprised in — (a) Property of Sri. Paul Jacob (R9) - admeasuring 2.28 acres (92.27 ares) comprised in Sy.No.969/4 and 969/9A- 3 having TP No.3477 of Memmury Village, Pampakuda Kara, Ernakulam District located in Ward N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top