Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MR. JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
Sajeev S ,Superintendent – Appellant
Versus
Dileep Sathyan S, – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Muralee Krishna, J.)
This contempt appeal is filed by the respondents in Contempt Case (C) No.2380 of 2024 against the interim order dated 05.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby it was found that prima facie the appellants committed contempt of Court by not releasing the respondent herein, a prisoner in custody who was granted interim bail as per the order of the learned Single Judge dated 14.08.2024 in B.A. No.6752 of 2024 and therefore directed to frame charge against the appellants.
2. This contempt appeal was originally filed under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. On 26.11.2024, when this matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Additional Director General of Prosecution (‘ADGP’ for short) and also the learned counsel for the respondent sought time to address arguments on the maintainability of the contempt appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act. On 06.12.2024, the learned ADGP filed I.A. No.1 of 2024 seeking an order to treat the appeal as one filed under Sec.5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 instead of Sec.19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act. After hearing the preliminary submissions made by both sid
An appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act is not maintainable for interlocutory orders, but an intra-court appeal under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act may be allowed if a....
The appeal process under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act requires a connection with an order punishing for contempt; proceedings not fulfilling this criterion are non-appealable.
An appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt, not against orders related to the merits of the dispute.
An intra-court appeal against an order dismissing contempt proceedings is not maintainable as per Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, which allows appeals only against orders imposing ....
The court clarified that in contempt proceedings, the judge's role is limited to assessing compliance with prior orders, not issuing new directives, emphasizing the maintainability of appeals under S....
An appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt; non-punitive orders are not appealable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limitation on the appealability of a contempt Judge's order under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules....
An appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act is not maintainable when the court has formed a prima facie opinion and proceeds to frame charges.
The Regulation-making power cannot be exercised so as to bring into existence substantive rights or obligations or disabilities which are not contemplated in terms of the provisions of the said Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
