IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Anantha Krishnan S/o Anilkumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These bail applications are filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. These bail applications are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these cases by a common order.
2. The petitioner in these cases are one and the same person. He was an accused in different Crimes registered at Aranmula Police Station, Koipuram Police Station and Thiruvalla Police Station, Pathanamthitta District. The above cases are now investigated by the Crime Branch Police. The above cases are registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable inter alia under Sections 406 and 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 3 and 5 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (for short ‘BUDS Act’).
3. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and the other accused cheated the defacto complainants in these cases by collecting huge amounts from them as deposits. It is alleged that neither the deposited amount nor the interest is not returned. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the offence.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The counsel for
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty must be prioritized unless justified by serious circumstances.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty.
The court emphasized that bail applications require careful consideration of personal liberty against the needs of police investigation and established trust in the accused to adhere to bail conditio....
The court emphasized the delicate balance between personal liberty and police investigation needs in non-bailable offences, granting bail based on the accused's age and health, while ensuring safegua....
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; conditions for granting bail must ensure cooperation with investigation.
Bail is the rule and incarceration is the exception; the court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and the necessity of justifying arrests.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; custodial interrogation was not necessary, allowing bail under stringent conditions.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine, ensuring personal liberty is respected.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; conditions for bail include cooperation with investigation and no further offences.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.