HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAMEER SALAHUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER :
These Bail Applications are filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
2. These bail applications are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these cases by a common order.
3. Petitioners in B.A No.2577/2025 are the accused in Crime No.127/2025 of Atholy Police Station and petitioners in B.A Nos. 2634/2025 & 2579/2025 are the accused in Crime No.128/2025 of Atholy Police Station.
4. The allegation in Crime No.127/2025 is that, the petitioner assured the defacto complainant that, they will deliver household items to the establishment run by the defacto complainant. It is alleged that the accused persons assured to the defacto complainant that, they will deal with all GST related matters of the defacto complainant. It is alleged that accused Nos.1 to 5 made fake bill of Rs.17,78,100/- in the name of the defacto complainant's company, to the company's account with an intention to cheat the defacto complainant and her husband.
5. The prosecution case in Crime No.128/2025 is that, the accused Nos.1 to 4 assured the defacto complainant from November 2023 onwards that, they will deliver household items to the establishment run by the defacto complainant na
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified by necessity, emphasizing personal liberty.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine, ensuring fair trial opportunities.
Bail is the rule and incarceration is the exception; the court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and the necessity of justifying arrests.
The court stressed on following principles laid down by the Apex Court regarding bail and interrogations, ensuring rights of the accused are upheld.
The court emphasized that bail applications require careful consideration of personal liberty against the needs of police investigation and established trust in the accused to adhere to bail conditio....
The court held that custodial interrogation is not necessary despite serious allegations, allowing pre-arrest bail based on the circumstances of the case.
The court emphasized the delicate balance between personal liberty and police investigation needs in non-bailable offences, granting bail based on the accused's age and health, while ensuring safegua....
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; custodial interrogation was not necessary, allowing bail under stringent conditions.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine, ensuring personal liberty is respected.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.