Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
Sreelekha @ Lekha, W/o. Chandran – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Kannur – Respondent
ORDER :
Annexure A1 order passed by the Additional Sessions Court - II, Kasaragod (for short, ‘the trial court’) in S.C. No.488/2012 under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code ( Cr.P.C.) is under challenge in this Crl.M.C.
2. One Jisha was stabbed to death at her house situated at Adukkamparambu in Madikai Panchayat at about 8.45 pm on 19.02.2012. The local Police registered an FIR and arrayed the maid servant of the house, one Mr. Tushar Sen Malik @ Madan Malik, a native of Odisha, as the sole accused. The local police initially conducted the investigation and filed the final report against the accused. The prosecution allegation is that the accused, who was employed by PW3 Chandran in his house to look after his aged father, planned to kill PW1 Sreelekha, but murdered the deceased Jisha on mistaken identity by stabbing her with a knife at 8.45 p.m. on 19.02.2012. Dissatisfied with the final report, the father of the deceased filed a Writ Petition before this Court as W.P.(C) No.9303/2013 seeking investigation by CBI. This Court, by its judgment dated 07.08.2013, directed the Crime Branch to take over the investigation and conduct further investigation. Accordingly, CBCID, Kan
The court emphasized that the power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. must be exercised sparingly and requires strong evidence of involvement, which was not present in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 319 of the Cr.P.C, which allows the court to proceed against a person not initially accused if eviden....
The power under Section 319 Cr.P.C is discretionary and should be exercised sparingly, only when strong and cogent evidence occurs against a person from the evidence led before the court.
The power under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. is discretionary and should be exercised before the conclusion of the trial. The Court must find prima facie evidence against the proposed accused and follow th....
Summoning of additional accused to face trial – Test that has to be applied is one which is more than prima facie case as exercised at the time of framing of charge, but short of satisfaction to an e....
The court emphasized that under Section 319 Cr.P.C., summoning additional accused requires substantial evidence, not just a prima facie case, and must be exercised with caution.
The court emphasized that the power under Section 319 CrPC to summon additional accused requires strong evidence and should be exercised judiciously, not casually.
The court upheld that a Trial Court may arraign additional accused when there is sufficient evidence indicating their involvement, as per Section 319 CrPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
