IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA
A. Sathyan, S/o. C. Ayyappan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary to Government, Ayush Department, Government Secretariat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.B. Snehalatha, J.
This Writ Appeal under Section 5(i) of the KERALA HIGH COURT ACT , 1958 is directed challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 4.4.2005 in W.P(C) No.18190 of 2024.
2. The appellant-petitioner herein filed the Writ Petition (C) No.18190 of 2024 invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari and to quash Ext.P7 Government order dated 8.5.2024 on the ground that the said order was issued by the 1st respondent State without considering Ext.P2 to P4, as directed in Ext.P6 judgment dated 15.03.2024 in W.P.(C) No.6337 of 2024 and to declare that daily wage employees under the Hospital Development Society (HDS) in the hospitals under the 2nd respondent Director of Homeopathy, including the appellant- petitioner are eligible and entitled for enhancement of age of superannuation from 56 years to the age of 65 years, as granted to their counterparts in the Health and Family Welfare Department, vide Ext.P2 Government order dated 02.08.2018 and to declare that appellant-petitioner is eligible to continue till the completion of age of 65 years or in the alternative upto the age
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Sipahi Singh
Daily wage employees under Hospital Development Society lack an indefeasible right to continue employment until age 65; discretion lies with the hospital authority.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of G.O.Ms.No.15, dtd. 31/1/2022, which enhanced the age of superannuation of Government Employees from 60 years to 62 years, t....
The Board of Directors of a Company holds the authority to determine service conditions, including retirement age, without mandatory state approval.
The enhancement of retirement age is a policy decision of the government, and employees cannot claim a right to continue in service pending such a decision.
The enhancement of retirement age is a policy decision of the government, not a right of employees, and cannot be mandated by the court.
Government Orders increasing retirement age do not apply to private school employees, as employment contracts govern such matters.
Contract employees are entitled to continue service until age 65 according to applicable government orders.
Employees lack entitlement to enforce governmental decisions on retirement policy; continuation in service pending governmental approval is warranted.
Court directed the State Government to expedite consideration of the Board resolution regarding the enhancement of retirement age for employees.
Employees of autonomous bodies like the DRDA cannot claim parity with state government employees regarding retirement benefits unless explicitly provided by law or policy, and changes in retirement a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.