SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 1909

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.JAYACHANDRAN
.......... – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : P. Jinish Paul, Sneha V.
For the Respondent: C.N. Prabhakaran

ORDER :

1. The culpability component in the context of offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ('B.N.S.' for short), and also the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 ('J.J. Act' for short), when a teacher canes a student in order to discipline him/her is the subject matter of these three Criminal Miscellaneous Cases, for which reason, the three cases are heard and disposed of by this Common Order.

2. Crl.M.C.No.8067/2024 Petitioner herein is the accused in Crime No.1375/2023 of Sulthan Bathery Police Station. She seeks to quash Annexure-A1 F.I.R. and also Annexure-A2 final report in the said crime. The prosecution would allege that the petitioner/accused had caned the victim, aged 9 years, due to his poor performance in the dictation conducted by the petitioner, besides publishing his mark list with zero marks in the WhatsApp group, causing physical and mental agony to the victim, thus committing the offences under Section 324 of the Penal Code and Section 75 of the J.J. Act.

3. Crl.M.C.No.9017/2024 The petitioner/accused seeks to quash Crime No.1521/2024 of Kodungallur Police Station. The prosecution would allege that the petitioner caned a student, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top