Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, P.M.MANOJ
State Of Kerala, Represented By The District Collector – Appellant
Versus
Thankamma Mathew, W/o. Late Mathew Vadakkel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to compensation based on lok adalat awards (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's duty to uphold compensation rights (Para 3) |
| 3. background of land acquisition and claim application (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. recognition of compliance lapses affecting claimants (Para 7) |
| 5. fair compensation in line with market norms (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
(A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.)
These writ appeals preferred by the State impugn the common judgment dated 30.05.2017 of the learned Single Judge in WP(C) Nos.28422, 31084, 31131, 31138 of 2012. The short issue decided by the learned Single Judge was whether a claimant for compensation under under Section 28A of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT was entitled to base his claim in respect of the land acquired from his possession, on an award passed by the Lok Adalat. The said issue was answered in the affirmative by the learned Single Judge by the judgment impugned in these writ appeals.
2. When these writ appeals came up for hearing before us, the learned Government Pleader brought to our notice the judgment of the Supreme Court in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) v. Yunus and Others [2022 (9) SCC 516] , wherein the Supreme Court categoric
An award from Lok Adalat cannot serve as a basis for a compensation claim under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, as it is not an adjudicated court award.
Compensation claims under Section 28A of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT must be based solely on court awards, not those from Lok Adalats, reinforcing the importance of formal adjudication.
(1) Application under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be maintained on the basis of an award passed by Lok Adalat under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 – Award pas....
Point of Law : Acquisition of Land - Re-determination of compensation - Award of Lok Adalat - Award of Lok Adalat, through an executable decree binding between parties to it, does not amount to a det....
Discrimination in compensation assessment can justify interference with Lok Adalat decisions, ensuring equitable treatment for similarly situated landowners.
Court directed timely re-determination of compensation in accordance with law as per specific sections of the Land Acquisition Act.
The court emphasized the necessity of procedural compliance in re-evaluating land compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
The court affirmed that delays in filing compensation claims under the Land Acquisition Act can be overlooked in favor of equitable treatment, preserving citizens' property rights under Article 300A.
A legal heir is entitled to claimed compensation based on promises made by land acquisition authorities, regardless of significant delay, emphasizing principles of equity and promissory estoppel.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
