SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2073

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
 
Lisieux Educational Institutions - Appellant 
Versus 
The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent 
WP(C) No. 22710 of 2024
Decided on : 11-04-2025
 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI.JOSEPH MARKOS, (SR.), SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS, SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS, SRI.ISAAC THOMAS, SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM, SRI.JOHN VITHAYATHIL
For the Respondent: SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SR.SC

A charitable institution must file income tax returns to claim exemptions under sections 11 and 12 prior to 2018, as registration alone is insufficient for eligibility.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 12, 12A, 139(4A), and 272A(2)(e) - Charitable institution's obligation to file income returns for claiming tax exemptions - Court held that a charitable trust must comply with filing requirements per sections 11 and 12 to claim exemption, reinforcing that registration under section 12A does not alone grant exemption. (Paras 1, 3, 4, 10, 13)

(B) Exemptions - Eligibility conditions - A charitable institution claiming tax exemption must file returns regardless of income levels or previous regulations—compliance with procedural requirements is essential for claiming benefits under the cited sections. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The trust, an educational institution, contended that non-filing of returns for the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17 did not invalidate its claim for tax exemption. The Income Tax Department rejected this claim citing required compliance with the filing provisions.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the trust was mandated to file returns for the relevant assessment years to maintain eligibility for tax exemptions.

Issues: The key issue addressed was whether the trust could claim exemption without filing a return of income prior to 2018.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that filing a return is a prerequisite for claiming exemptions under sections 11 and 12; thus, the absence of a filed return precludes any claim for exemption.

Result: The writ petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. charitable trust's duty to file returns for exemption (Para 1 , 7)
2. petitioner claims exemption without filing returns (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. arguments on filing obligations under tax law (Para 5 , 6)
4. interpretations of tax provisions governing charitable trusts (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court concludes on filing requirement for tax exemption (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

The question that arises for consideration is whether a charitable institution registered under section 12A of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) was required to file a return of income for the purposes of claiming the benefit of exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Act, prior to 2018.

2. Petitioner is a charitable trust rendering educational services and is an assessee under the Act. According to the petitioner, for the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17, its entire receipts were applied for charitable purposes and hence it was not necessary to file a return of income. Since petitioner had not filed the return for the aforementioned assessment years, the Income Tax Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Act proposing to assess the petitioner under section 147 of the Act by alleging that there were reasons to believe that the net income over expenditure had escaped assessment. Petitioner further alleges that, since it had not received any notice, a response could not be filed and later, when a show cause notice was issued, a detailed reply was furnished and all documents were made available. Thereafter, despite accepting the Income and Expenditure Account and the Balance Sheet, the excess income over expenditure was assessed in the hands of the petitioner, treating it as an ‘association of persons’ for the sole reason of not having filed a return of income.

3. Petitioner pleads that the assessment order, without giving the benefit of the exemption under section 11 of the Act, for the sole reason of not filing a return of income, is erroneous. Challenging the assessment orders, a revision petition was preferred before the second respondent. During the pendency of the aforesaid revision petition, the third respondent imposed a penalty under section 272A(2)(e) of the Act for non-filing of returns, which was also challenged in a revision petition filed under section 264 of the Act. Subsequently, by orders dated 21.03.2024, the second respondent rejected the revision petitions filed by the petitioner against the assessment orders and by orders dated 30.03.2024 and 24.03.2024, the second respondent rejected the revision petitions filed by the petitioner against the penalty. The said orders are under challenge in this writ petition. Petitioner has also sought for a declaration that, as a charitable institution, it is eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Act, notwithstanding the non-filing of returns for the years 2015-16 and 2016-17.

4. A statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents pleading that, the registration under section 12A of the Act by itself, does not confer any right for exemption to the petitioner under sections 11 and 12 of the Act. It is averred that the exemption from taxation will arise only when the assessee complies with the conditions laid down in sections 11, 12, 12A and 13 of the Act, apart from other provisions of the statute. Respondents also pleaded that filing of return of income is a condition precedent for the applicability of sections 11 and 12 of the Act for the assessment years 2015- 16 and 2016-17 as per section 12A(1)(b) of the Act. It is further stated that, despite granting ample opportunities, petitioner had failed to furnish any justification for not filing the income tax returns, thereby rendering itself ineligible for grant of exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Act. According to the respondents, petitioner falls in the category of a representative assessee as defined under section 160 of the Act and whatever income the trust receive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top