SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2164

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
 
P. Vijayan, S/o. Parameswaran Nair - Appellant 
Versus 
Central Bureau Of Investigation - Respondent 
Crl.Rev. Petition Nos. 1198, 1125 & 1137 of 2024
Decided on : 01-08-2025
 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD, SHRI.VARGHESE PARAMBIL, SMT.SETHULEKSHMI PRABHA, SHRI.ASHOK K.V.
For the Respondent: ADV SHRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER,SREELAL N.WARRIER, SPL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)

The lack of direct evidence does not invalidate the prosecution's case when circumstantial evidence sufficiently indicates conspiracy and illegal acts by public servants involved in emigration clearances.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 120B, 201, and Sections 11, 12, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act - Emigration Act - Charges of conspiracy to clear passengers for illegal emigration without proper documentation - Applications for discharge by accused dismissed due to insufficient evidence and the nature of the alleged visa lacking clarity - Prosecutorial arguments supported by circumstantial evidence indicating illegal gratification through collusion of accused - Special Court found sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant proceeding against accused. (Paras 5, 10, 18)

(B) Discharge petition - Burden of proof - The burden lies on the prosecution to present adequate evidence to establish involvement in conspiracy and corruption-related offences in light of discretion exercised by the Special Court. (Paras 6, 14, 16)

Facts of the case:
The prosecution involves multiple accused who allegedly conspired to illegally facilitate emigration through corruption and collusion at the Cochin International Airport, leading to charges under IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. There was a lack of direct evidence connecting the accused with specific breaches of law.

Findings of Court:
The special court found that despite challenges, sufficient evidence exists to continue prosecution for the charges of conspiracy and corruption-related offences against several accused.

Issues: The court addressed the adequacy of the evidence presented to sustain charges against each accused and the legal implications of the evidence's nature regarding the visas.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a prima facie showing of conspiracy suffices to deny discharge, even without direct evidence, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence can sufficiently establish a case.

Result: Petitions dismissed; applications for discharge rejected.

Table of Content
1. filing of criminal revision petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's decision to hear arguments (Para 4)
3. details of allegations against accused (Para 5)
4. arguments against discharge applications (Para 6 , 7 , 9)
5. reference to similar case outcomes (Para 8)
6. judicial reasoning and legal standards (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
7. prosecution needs evidence of visa nature (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. rejection of discharge applications (Para 18)
9. final dismissal of petitions (Para 19)

ORDER :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

Criminal Revision Petition No. 1198 of 2024 has been filed by the 5th accused in C.C. No. 22 of 2016 pending before the Special Judge (SPE/CBI) – I, Ernakulam, challenging the order dated 31.08.2024 in Crl. M.P. No. 104 of 2022, whereby the discharge plea at the instance of the 5th accused was dismissed.

2. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1125 of 2024 has been filed by the 6th accused in the same case, aggrieved by the dismissal of his discharge petition viz Crl. M.P. No. 103 of 2022, also as per the order dated 31st August 2024.

3. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1137 of 2024 has been filed by the 7th accused in the same case, who also is aggrieved by the dismissal of his discharge petition viz Crl. M.P. No. 265 of 2024, by order dated 31st August 2024.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in detail. Perused the orders impugned.

5. The allegations against accused Nos. 5, 6, and 7 as per the charge filed by the CBI are as follows:-

“A1 A.P.Ajeeb, a Public Servant employed in Kerala Police as Civil Police Officer, while working at Cochin International Airport immigration Wing during 2010-11, together with A-4 Shri. MK Babu, Armed Police Sub Inspector of Kerala Police, (Retired), A-6 Shri. A. Shaji, Armed Police Sub Inspector of Kerala Police, A-7 Shri. PT Koshy, Armed Police Sub Inspector of Kerala Police, A-8 Shri. P. Mohanan, Armed Police Sub Inspector of Kerala Police (Retired), who was functioning as Immigration officer at Cochin International Airport Limited, Nedumbassery, Ernakulam, during the same period entered into a criminal conspiracy with A-3 Shri. KM Nazeer Babu @ Shaji Prop. M/s. Air Travel Associates, SNDP Building, Kodungallur, Thrissur, A-9, Shri. CM Sohal, Prop. M/s Mariha Tours & Travels, Narangapuram, Thalassery, Kannur, A-10 Shri. V V Antony Prop. M/s National Air Travels, Thrissur, to issue illegal emigration clearance to passengers proceeding abroad without valid travel documents, by abusing the official position of the public servants employed as counter officers, and to obtain pecuniary advantage for themselves. In pursuance of the said criminal conspiracy, A-3 Shri. KM Nazeer Babu @ Shaji, A-9 Shri. CM Sohal and A-10 Shri. VV Antony forwarded their passengers without valid travel documents to A-1 Shri.AP Ajeeb and he, with the undue influence exerted on his senior officers on counter duty, abusing their official position, cleared the passengers to travel abroad without valid travel documents. In furtherance of the said criminal conspiracy, A-1 collected bribes from the passengers through the travel agents, and the same was deposited in the SB A/c.No. 11640100075688 of Shri. AS Pareeth A-2 held at Federal Bank Kottapady Branch. Shri.AS Pareeth A-2, father of A-1, knowingly allowed A-1 and other accused persons to use his account for depositing illegal gratification to be withdrawn and paid to concerned counter officers, and accordingly, A-1 withdrew the bribe amounts and distributed the bribe amount in cash to the concerned counter officers who illegally cleared the passengers. A-5 Shri. P. Vijayan, Armed Police Sub Inspector of Kerala Police, joined the conspiracy during June 2011 and illegally cleared two passengers, Shri. K Rajesh and Shri. MA Subair, through Trivandrum International Airport, on 13.6.2011, who could not proceed through Cochin Airport on 11.6.2011.

A-3 Shri.KM Nazeer Babu, @ Shaji Prop

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top