IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M.
Cochin International Airport Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Information Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Heard Sri.S.Sreekumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant with Adv.Sri.S.Harikrishnan, and Sri.M.Ajay and Sri.Paul Jacob, learned counsel appearing for respondents.
2. Taking into consideration the facts and the similitude of the controversy involved in these batch of appeals, they have been heard analogously and decided by this common judgment.
3. The facts of W.A No.45 of 2023 are taken up for consideration for deciding the batch of appeals.
4. The present appeals arise against the final judgment dated 02.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 20387 of 2019 and connected cases (Cochin International Airport Ltd. v. The State Information Commission & Another), wherein the Court after undertaking a meticulous analysis concluded that the Cochin International Airport Authority Ltd. (for short, ‘CIAL’), is a ‘public authority’ within the confines of Sec. 2(h)(d)(i) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short, ‘RTI Act’) and therefore amenable to obligations of disclosure of information held by it to third parties and public at large, approaching it for divulging various heads of information sou
Ajay Hasia & Ors. v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors.
Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India v. Cricket Association of Bengal
PUCL & another v. Union of India & Ors.
Air India Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport Ltd. & Others
D.A.V. College Trust & Management Society & Ors. v. Director of Public Instructions & Ors.
Nripendra Nath Bagchi v. State
Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. L.V.A. Dixitulu & Ors.
A body is classified as a public authority under the RTI Act if it is substantially financed and controlled by the government, emphasizing transparency in public administration.
The Air Force Sports Complex is not a public authority under the RTI Act as it lacks substantial government control and financing, operating independently without performing public functions.
Temples do not qualify as a 'Public Authority' under the RTI Act as they are not owned, controlled, or substantially financed by the government, thus invalidating a prior circular imposing such desig....
Temples do not qualify as 'Public Authorities' under the Right to Information Act as they are neither owned nor substantially financed by the government; mere public contributions do not equate to go....
Spectrum is a natural resource which belongs to people, and State, its instrumentalities or licensee, as case may be, who deal with same, hold it on behalf of people are accountability to people. Sim....
Nirmiti Kendra is a public authority under the RTI Act, subject to transparency requirements due to government control and funding.
An educational institution receiving government funding qualifies as a Public Authority under the RTI Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.