Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Pulikkippoyil Sharafudheen, S/o. Kader Pulikkippoyil – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent Of Customs (AIU), Air Customs Calicut International Airport, Represented By Its Standing Counsel, High Court Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case concerning gold smuggling (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding bail applicability (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on bail and smuggling implications (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. legal definitions and interpretations relevant to the case (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 15) |
| 5. final decision on bail applications (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER :
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
Petitioners are husband and wife. They face an indictment for the offence under section 135 of the CUSTOMS ACT , 1962 (for short 'the Act') alleging import of gold, the market price of which exceeds Rupees One Crore. They were taken into custody on 18.05.2023 and hence seek enlargement on bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Code').
2. Information was received by the Air Intelligence Unit of the Air Customs, International Airport, Calicut, that one Amjad Mihran was indulging in smuggling of gold into India using carriers, including family members. A strict vigil was therefore maintained over the passengers. Based on the intelligence input, petitioners, who were travelling from Dubai to Calicut by Spicejet Flight SG 54, were intercepted at th
The cumulative value of goods smuggled may be considered for identifying the seriousness of the offence under the Customs Act when multiple individuals act in concert.
Section 135 of Customs Act, 1952 reads as evasion of duty or prohibitions.
The court held that the offence under the Customs Act is bailable as the value of gold in individual possession is below Rs. 1 Crore, classifying the goods as restricted rather than prohibited.
The court held that the offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act is bailable when the value of the goods is below Rs. 1 Crore and classified as restricted rather than prohibited.
Smuggling of gold, even with intent to threaten economic security, does not constitute a terrorist act under Section 15(1)(a)(iiia) of the UA(P)A.
Quasi-judicial proceedings require strict adherence to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine witnesses, which was violated in this case, rendering the confiscation order....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the illegal diversion of duty-free imported gold to the domestic market and mis-declaration of exported jewelry are serious offenses that can ....
Once an offence under PMLA is registered on the basis of a scheduled offence, then it stands on its own and it thereafter does not require support of predicate/scheduled offence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
