Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN
Anandan R., S/o. Raghavan S – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the sole accused in C.C.No.315 of 2016 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court (Temporary), Sasthamcotta, arose out of Crime No.1102 of 2010 of Sooranadu Police Station, seeking the relief to quash Annexures A1 FIR, A4 final report and further proceedings in the above case.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the defacto complainant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the records available and the decisions placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The prosecution case is that the accused, who was appointed as the power of attorney holder of the defacto complainant to manage the day-to-day affairs of SPMUP School, Ayikunnam, exceeded the power he was given as the Power of Attorney Holder and appointed one Rajeev.V, as Peon on 11.06.2007 and obtained Rs.6 lakh from him. The further allegation is that he also misappropriated gold ornaments weighing 90 grams entrusted by the defacto complainant to arrange air ticket for her by pledging the same for excess amount and thereby he committe
An FIR can be quashed when allegations do not establish a prima facie case for the charges under IPC sections relevant to cheating and criminal breach of trust, highlighting the need for sufficient e....
To sustain a conviction under Sections 409 and 420 IPC, the prosecution must establish specific allegations and necessary legal elements, which were not met in this case.
To sustain charges under IPC Sections 409 and 420, clear evidence of entrustment, dishonest intention, and deception is essential, which was not established in this case.
The court ruled that prima facie evidence supports the allegations against the petitioner, affirming that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised cautiously and not for merit as....
Public servants misappropriating funds and failing to remit them can be convicted under the PC Act and IPC. The absence of documentation does not exempt accountability for the misappropriation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a public servant can be held liable for criminal misconduct and breach of trust under relevant legal provisions, and the court has the discret....
The accused was convicted for misappropriating public funds by failing to account for money entrusted to her, establishing criminal breach of trust and corrupt practices under the relevant sections.
The ingredients of the offenses under Sections 405/406/420 IPC are prima facie present in the case, as there was evidence of entrustment of the jewelry, dishonest intention at the time of the transac....
The Court held that the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash a criminal proceeding if it is found that the proceeding is an abuse of the process of the Co....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
