SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2559

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J, A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
Bobby Kuruvila, S/o. Kuruvila – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Rep.By Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. V. John Sebastian Ralph, Sri. B. Deepak, Sri. Vishnu Chandran, Sri. Ralph Reti John, Sri. Appu Babu, Smt. Shifna Muhammed Shukkur.
For the Respondents: Sri. B. Raman Pillai (SR.), S.U. Nazar, Special Public Prosecutor (Criminal), Sri. A. Rajesh, Special Public Prosecutor (Vigilance), Rekha S., Senior Government Pleader, Sri. S. Rajeev, Sri. V. Vinay, Sri. M.S. Aneer, Sri. Sarath K.P., Sri. Anilkumar C.R., Sri. K.S. Kiran Krishnan, Smt. Dipa V., Sri. Akash Cherian Thomas, Sri. Azad Sunil.

Table of Content
1. appellant's allegations against further investigation. (Para 2 , 3)
2. discussion on locus standi and state power. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. analysis of state authority and procedural integrity. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 12)
4. court's determination on order validity. (Para 9 , 11)
5. final decision allowing the writ appeal. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

The petitioner in W.P(C).No.1291 of 2021 is the appellant before us in this writ appeal that impugns the judgment dated 15.09.2021 of a learned Single Judge dismissing his writ petition. The brief facts necessary for a disposal of this writ appeal are as follows;

The facts in brief:

2. The appellant is stated to be an anti-corruption crusader who has been relentlessly fighting against corruption and nefarious activities of government servants including the 2nd respondent herein. In the writ petition, he impugned an order dated 28.01.2021 of the State Government in the Vigilance department whereby the State Government had accorded sanction for a further investigation in Crime No.VC3/2007/SCE by invoking Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure [hereinafter referred to as the “Code”] and entrusting the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top