Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. Manu, J
Natarajan Nadar, S/o.Balakrishnan Nadar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and transfer of property rights (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for and against ownership transfer (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. analysis of decision-making authority and process (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final orders on property conveyance (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
S.MANU, J.
Since common issues are involved in these writ petitions they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Reference to the parties in this judgment is as per the cause title in W.P.(C)No.14360/2011.
2. First petitioner claims to be the absolute owner of 31.12 Ares of property comprised in Re.Sy.Nos.306/9, 306/22, 307/3 and 307/4 in Kanjiramkulam Village, Neyyattinkara Taluk. Second petitioner is the wife of the first petitioner. She claims to be the absolute owner of the property comprised in Re.Sy.No.307/15 having an extent of 4.25 Ares in the same Village. The said properties were originally owned by one Nadesan Nadar, Syamalakumari and one Antony. They executed sale deeds in favour of the petitioners on an understanding that their liabilities arising out of a loan transaction with the 7th respondent Co-operative Bank will be cleared by the petitioners. They had availed a loa
The Registrar of Co-operative Societies has the authority to direct the return of property based on historical ownership agreements and factual findings, reaffirming that judicial review should ensur....
The government must adhere to prior judicial directions and established legal procedures in liquidation matters, as ignoring them undermines judicial authority.
Authority under Section 70 enables the Additional Registrar to cancel improper allotments and registered sale deeds within cooperative societies, reinforcing adherence to bylaws and judicial oversigh....
Reconsideration of loan settlement request must comply with statutory provisions and prior judicial directions, invalidating arbitrary government interference.
The court established that under the MCS Act, the issuance of recovery certificates involves a summary inquiry focused on the quantification of arrears, and that disputes requiring evidence must be a....
A bank cannot enforce an award against a grantee who is not a party to the loan transaction, as there is no privity of contract.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
