SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 69

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., K.V.JAYAKUMAR
Suo Motu – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents: G. Biju, S. Rajmohan, Sayujya Radhakrishnan

Table of Content
1. status report by chief vigilance officer highlights issues in temple management. (Para 1 , 2)
2. clarification of reporting mechanisms and necessary timeliness for proper oversight. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. discusses implications of delayed reporting on the management process. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

1. This report pertains to the submission of the periodical status report of the Chief Vigilance Officer. In this report, the Special Commissioner, Sabarimala has cited the order in DBP 2/2022 dated 14.02.2022. Clause (v) of the order reads as follows:

2. In this report, the Special Commissioner, Sabarimala has pointed out various instances of vigilance inspections conducted as reported by the Chief Vigilance Officer of Sabarimala with regard to the malpractices, misconduct, unauthorized absence of the temple staff and the misconduct of the employees of other temples coming under the Travancore Devaswom Board.

4. While disposing of SSCR No.28/2023, this Court issued the following directions:

(ii) The reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer, which requires immediate Interference, shall be placed before the Board immediately on receipt of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top