SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
Pankaj Bhandari, Son of Badan Raj Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. B. Raman Pillai (SR.), Sri. S. Vishnu (V-736), Sri. V.S. Viswambharan, Shri. Naik Chirag Dhananjay, Smt. Mathrawala Noopur Vishal, Shri. Mahesh Bhanu S., Sri. R. Anil, Shri. Sujesh Menon V.B., Smt. Lilin Lal.
For the Respondent: Sri. Gracious Kuriakose, Addl. Director General of Prosecution.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The petition challenged the legality of the petitioner’s arrest and remand orders, alleging violations of constitutional safeguards under Articles 21 and 22. (!) (!) (!) - The court discussed the distinction between the "grounds of arrest" and "reasons for arrest," emphasizing the need to inform the arrestee of the grounds in writing in a language known to him. (!) (!) (!) (!) - It addressed the requirement to inform friends, relatives, or nominated persons about the arrest under Section 50A and the purpose of such communication. (!) (!) (!) - The case analyzed whether grounds were communicated adequately to the arrestee and to a nominated person (Rajasekharan) and the effect of communications to the wife via email. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - It considered whether remand applications and grounds contained in remand reports were supplied and whether the absence of timely legal consultation violated rights. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - The judgment ultimately dismissed the petition, finding that procedures of arrest and remand were complied with and that non-compliance, if any, did not render the arrest illegal. (!)

What is the legality of the arrest and remand in light of the grounds of arrest and procedural safeguards under Articles 21 and 22?

What is the required communication of grounds of arrest to the arrestee and to nominated/relatives under Section 50A and related provisions?

What is the impact of delays or lack of legal counsel access on the legality of arrest and remand procedures?


Table of Content
1. petitioner's arrest details and case status. (Para 1 , 8)
2. arguments against legality of arrest. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. discussion of legal requirements for arrest. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's understanding of grounds vs. reasons for arrest. (Para 14 , 15)
5. final judgment declaring arrest as legal. (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT :

A.BADHARUDEEN, J.

This writ petition has been filed by Pankaj Bhandari, who is the 9th accused in Crime No.3701/2025 and 12th accused in Crime No.3700/2025, registered by Crime Branch, Kollam. The prayers are as under:

“i. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to declare that the arrest of the Petitioner on 19.12.2025 in FIR No. 3700 of 2025 and FIR No. 3701 of 2025 registered by the Crime Branch, Kollam is illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India.

ii. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the remand order dated 19.12.2025 in FIR No. 3700 of 2025 and FIR No. 3701 of 2025 registered by the Crime Branch, Kollam and all consequential and subsequent remand orders passed by the Hon'ble Enquiry Commission & Special Judge (Vigilance), Kollam, and declare the same as null and void having been rendere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top