SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 185

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
Nevil John S/o I T Johny - Appellant
Vs.
Kerala Water Authority Represented By Its Assistant Executive Engineer - Respondent
WP(C) No. 29085 of 2025
Decided On : 04-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri.Dileep Varghese, Smt.Tesmy Vargheese
For the Respondent: Sri.Justine Jacob, Sri.Georgie Johny-Kwa -Standing Counsel

The court ruled that a building cannot be classified as 'multistoried' under the Act without meeting specified conditions for non-domestic usage, regardless of total plinth area.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1986 - Section 2(xva) - Definition of ‘multi storied building’ - Challenges against order to draw water pipeline for domestic connection - Court examined if petitioner's building met criteria as defined - Total plinth area is not determinative without the non-domestic area meeting specified minimum - Court concluded that petitioner's building does not qualify as a multistoried building, hence regulations concerning minimum pipeline diameter do not apply. (Paras 1-12)

(B) Legal interpretation - Statutory definitions must be adhered to, even against common understanding; misuse concerns do not permit deviation from explicit definitions. (Paras 8-11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner seeks a domestic water connection for the first floor of a two-storied building, disputing the requirement to connect to a CSME line due to designation as a ‘multi storied building’. Respondents maintain the building qualifies under statutory definitions due to total plinth area.

Findings of Court:
The court found the non-domestic area of the petitioner’s building fell short of the statutory requirement, thus not categorizing it as a multi storied building, quashing the respondents' directives.

Issues: Whether the petitioner’s building qualifies as a ‘multistoried building’ under the Act and the enforceability of related water connection requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the statutory definition of ‘multistoried building’ dictates that both criteria must be satisfied, and the mere total area does not suffice for categorization, emphasizing adherence to definitions.

Result: Ext.P2 communication quashed; respondents to consider the application for domestic water connection promptly.

Table of Content
1. definition and context of multi storied buildings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the classification of the building. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's interpretation of multi storied building definition. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. legal conclusion on water connection eligibility. (Para 12)
5. final order granting relief to the petitioner. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

The scope and meaning of the term ‘multi storied building’ as defined in Section 2 (xva) of the Kerala Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1986 (for brevity ‘the Act’), arises for consideration in this writ petition.

2. The petitioner challenges Ext. P2 order issued by the 2nd respondent, whereby he was directed to establish a water pipeline termed as Contributory Street Main Extension (for short ‘CSME’) line, to obtain a water connection to his building. The petitioner also seeks for a direction to consider his application for the grant of domestic water connection to the first floor of his building.

3. The petitioner has constructed a two storied building in his property. Ext.P1 occupancy certificate was issued by the Kochi Corporation, wherein the nature of occupation is identified differently for each of the floors with 299.40 sq.m. at the ground floor, apart from 48.98 sq.m. as commercial, and 414.55 sq.m. in the first floor of the building as residential. Subsequent to the completion of construction, petitioner applied for grant of water connection under the domestic category only for the first floor of the building. However, by Ext.P2 communication dated 29.07.2025, it was informed that the petitioner has to draw a water line at his expense, from Banerjee Road, about 500m away from petitioner’s plot, where the CSME line has been laid. According to the respondents, water connection to a multi storied building can be provided only from a CSME line having a minimum diameter of 150 mm. Petitioner challenges the said direction, as such a line will have to be drawn for about 500 meters at his own expense.

4. A statement has been filed on behalf of respondents, pleading that petitioner’s building falls under the category called ‘multistoried building’, as defined in Section 2 (xva) the Act and, since the total plinth area of the building is 811.55 sq.m., the water connection to the said building can be provided only through a pipeline having minimum diameter of 150 mm. According to the respondents, the Water Authority will not refuse to grant water connection to the petitioner, provided he agrees to draw a CSME line from Banerji Road till his building, at his expense.

5. Sri. Dileep Varghese, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner’s building does not fall in the category of a ‘multistoried building’ and since the water connection applied for, is solely for domestic purposes, that too, for the first floor of the building, under no circumstances can respondents insist on the petitioner laying a CSME Line.

6. Sri. Justine Jacob, the learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submitted that as per Ext.P2 letter it was communicated to the petitioner, that since the building of the petitioner falls under the category of multistoried building, as per Section 38 (A)(2) of the Act, a water connection can be provided only from a pipeline having a minimum diameter of 150 mm, laid along the road. Since no such pipeline exists in the area where the petitioner’s building is situated, such a line would have to be drawn at petitioner’s expense from the CSME line, passing through Banerji Road.

7. The question posed at the proem arises in view of the above rival contentions. While answering the above question, it is essential to peruse the definition of the term ‘multistoried building’, as defined in Section 2 (xva) of the Act, which reads as follows: “multistoried building” means buildings in a premise having five or more units or having a total plinth area of five hundred square meters or more used for non domestic ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top