IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, Muralee Krishna S., JJ.
State Of Kerala, Represented By Secretary To Government, General Education Department – Petitioner
Versus
The Manager, Jama-Ath L.P. School – Respondent
WA NO. 2026 OF 2025
Decided On : 17-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. directing compliance with previous judgments and orders (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The respondents in W.P.(C)No.44138 of 2024 have filed this writ appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 27.02.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, which was one filed by the respondents herein, i.e., the 1st respondent Manager of Jama-ath L.P.School, and the 2nd respondent Lower Primary School Teacher, seeking the following reliefs;
“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Ext.P3 and quash the same to the extent it approves the appointment of the 2nd petitioner only on daily wage basis;
(ii) Issue a writ of certiorari of any other writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Exts.P7, P8 and P9 and quash the same to the extent it does not approve the appointment of the 2nd petitioner as LPST on regular basis;
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to approve the appointment of the 2nd petitioner as L.P.S.T on regular basis in the scale of pay and disburse all consequential benefits including arrears of salary;
(iv) Declare that Clause 2(ix) of Ext.P2 and Clause 2(7) of Ext.P10 should not be made applicable to the school of the 1st petitioner in view of setting apart of established vacancy for accommodating a qualified disabled hand any time now remaining unfilled due to non-availability of a qualified disabled hand;”
2. By the judgment dated 27.02.2025, the learned Single Judge disposed of that writ petition with the directions contained in the last paragraph of that judgment. Paragraphs 12 to 16 and also the last paragraph of that judgment read thus;
“12. By Ext.P3, the 2nd petitioner's appointment as LPST with effect from 21.02.2022 was approved only on daily wage basis. Ext.P3 stated that as and when the appointments are made as per reservation norms applicable to physically disabled persons, then the 2nd petitioner's appointment can be regularised.
13. It is the specific case of the Manager that the Manager had addressed letters to the Special Employment Exchange and the Special Employment Officer has issued Non Availability Certificate stating that competent Persons with Disabilities, are not available for appointment as Teachers in the 1st petitioner's School.
14. Ext.P7 order dated 15.10.2024 was issued by the 1st respondent. In Ext.P7, there is a specific finding that there are no persons with physical disabilities who are qualified to be given appointment in the 1st petitioner's School. A direction was given to the Assistant Educational Officer as per Ext.P3 to approve the appointment of the 2nd petitioner following Ext.P2 G.O.(MS)No.29/2023/GEDN dated 24.03.2023. Subsequently, the Assistant Educational Officer has issued Ext.P8 communication to the Manager of the School requiring the Assistant Educational Officer to inform whether the reservation norms were strictly adhered to.
15. It is an admitted position that inspite of various efforts taken by the 1st petitioner, the Special Employment Exchange was not able to provide physically challenged persons. After Ext.P4, the Manager of the School has issued advertisements in three leading newspapers. However, inspite of the earnest efforts, any physically disabled persons did not came forward with an application for appointment.
16. In such circumstances, the 2nd petitioner, who is duly appointed through a selection process cannot be condemned to draw salary on daily wage basis. The 2nd petitioner was appointed on 21.02.2022, more than three years have lapsed since her appointment.
In the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of setting aside Exts.P3, P7, P8 and P9. There will be a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to approve the appointment of the 2nd petitioner as LPST with effect from the date of her



The court reinforced that unfilled vacancies for physically disabled persons should not obstruct the regularization of qualified appointments in educational institutions.
The court recognized the validity of a Government Order affecting the appointment of teachers, emphasizing the need for fair consideration of claims under new circumstances.
The court maintains that government orders and circulars stipulating reservation rosters for differently-abled persons in aided educational institutions, when aligned with statutory provisions, const....
Court emphasizes the necessity of reconsideration in light of government orders affecting the approval process of appointments under the RPWD Act.
A writ appeal filed by a teacher challenging the selection of a Headmaster in a special school was dismissed after the appellant informed the court that the appeal was no longer being pressed.
The judgment clarifies that compliance with reservation norms is essential for approving appointments in aided schools.
Violated principles of natural justice in terminating the service of a differently abled teacher without a hearing.
The judgment affirms that teachers' appointments must be approved from original dates, subject to verification, ensuring equality in treatment.
The court asserts that daily wage appointments must be considered according to existing legal directives despite prevailing vacancies.
The court ruled that appointments can be approved on a regular basis despite reserved vacancies for Persons with Disabilities, following a recent Supreme Court order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.