Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Arun Kumar.P – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Key Points: - The petition is under Section 483 BNSS seeking regular bail for an NDPS case (offence under Section 22(c) NDPS Act) (!) (!) - The court held that informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article 22(1) and Section 47 BNSS; noncompliance can violate fundamental rights and personal liberty (!) - The case discusses prior Supreme Court judgments stating that grounds must be informed in writing but there is debate on mandatory written communication; later decisions emphasize informing grounds in writing in each case, especially under NDPS where quantity specification is relevant (!) - In this case, notices under Sections 47 and 48 BNSS were served; grounds were communicated to applicant and relative, but quantity of contraband was not specified in the notices; however, the notices stated the seized quantity as a "commercial quantity" (!) - The court concluded that proper communication of grounds occurred since the grounds stated the quantity as intermediate or commercial, thereby satisfying 47 and 48 BNSS; bail application dismissed on this basis (!) - The alleged offence occurred on 08.01.2026; the applicant has been in custody since arrest (!) - Therefore, the bail application was dismissed due to compliance with grounds of arrest communication and other factors (after analysis) (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail under bnss. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on illegal arrest due to non-communication. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on communication requirements for arrest. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. judicial findings on statutory compliance. (Para 9) |
ORDER :
Kauser Edappagath, J.
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.27/2026 of Medical College Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 22 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 08.01.2026, at about 08:44 a.m., the applicant was found in possession of 194.99 grams of MDMA in a road near Kovoor Cochin Bakery and thereby committed the offence.
4. I have heard Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.V.Sreeja, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the requirement of informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article 22(1) of the Constitution
Mandatory communication of arrest grounds under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and BNSS is essential; failure to provide specifics on contraband quantity does not invalidate arrest if sufficient i....
An arrest under the NDPS Act is valid despite failure to communicate the quantity of contraband to those not in possession of it, provided their role is duly explained.
Non-communication of arrest grounds violates constitutional rights, necessitating procedural compliance.
Non-compliance with the mandatory requirement to inform arrested individuals of grounds for arrest can render the arrest illegal; however, if procedures are followed, the application for bail may be ....
The requirement to communicate grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article 22(1) and noncompliance can render an arrest illegal.
Compliance with statutory obligations in arrest procedures is essential, particularly communicating grounds of arrest to uphold constitutional rights.
Noncompliance with arrest grounds notification violates fundamental rights, but if proper procedures are followed, the arrest remains valid.
Notification of arrest grounds is constitutionally mandated and noncompliance renders arrest illegal, barring compelling reasons.
Failure to communicate grounds of arrest renders it illegal and violative of constitutional rights.
Failure to inform arrestee of grounds of arrest violates constitutional rights, rendering the arrest illegal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
