SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
Aneesh S/o Balan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 1205 of 2014
Decided On : 31-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vipin Narayan

Marriage and the welfare of children can influence the reconsideration of criminal convictions, even in serious offences.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 363, 366, and 376(i) - Criminal appeal - The appellant was convicted for offences of kidnapping and sexual assault, resulting in a cumulative sentence of 22 years' imprisonment and fines. However, post-conviction, the appellant and victim married and had children. Considering their legal marriage and the welfare of the children, the court found that the interests of justice warranted setting aside the conviction. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Marriage and Criminal Responsibility - While marriage does not absolve criminal culpability, the context of harmony and welfare of children can influence judicial outcomes. (Paras 2)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was found guilty of serious offences under IPC, sentenced concurrently, but appealed after marrying the victim and having three children together.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the marriage and children's welfare, leading to the decision to overturn the conviction.

Issues: The court framed the main issue as whether the marriage and subsequent family life could impact the criminal conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that while criminal responsibility persists, the welfare of the family and interest of justice justified reconsidering the conviction.

Result: Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside.

Table of Content
1. summary of the case and charges against the appellant. (Para 1)
2. marriage of appellant and victim influencing appeal. (Para 2)
3. court's decision to set aside conviction based on welfare of children. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT :

A. BADHARUDEEN, J.

1. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 10.12.2013 in S.C. No. 31/2013 on the files of the Sessions Court, Kalpetta, where the appellant/accused was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376(i) of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced as under:

“In the result, the accused is found guilty under Section 363, 366 and 376(i) IPC . The accused is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and payment of fine of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) in default undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months under . He is further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and payment of fine of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) in default undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 366 of IPC. The accused is further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and payment of fine of Rs. 25,000 (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) in default rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 376 IPC. The fine amount if realised shall be paid over to the victim towards compensation under Section 357 (1)(b) of Cr.P.C. The sentences shall run concurrently. The accused is eligible for set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C.”

2. During the pendency of the criminal case, the victim and the appellant/accused solemnised their marriage and started residing together and accordingly, three children were born to them. In a previous occasion, the appellant/accused and the victim, who are living as husband and wife, appeared before this Court and submitted that they are living in harmony and any finding by this Court, confirming the conviction and sentence would be fatal to them as the same would destroy their life as well as the three children, born and looked after by them in harmony. Even though, the offences alleged are serious in nature and the marriage by itself would not take away the criminal culpability, the interest of justice would inevitably warrant interference in the conviction and sentence in the facts of this case, particularly, in view of the direction issued by this Court now the parties are legally married and the marriage certificate has been issued by the Noolpuzha Grama Panchayat showing that their marriage was registered on 11.03.2026, in confirmation of the solemnisation of the marriage on 14.08.2012.

3. In this factual scenario, in the interest of justice and in consideration of the paramount welfare of the minor children, this Court is inclined to interfere with the conviction and sentence by allowing this appeal. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant/accused are set aside and he is set at liberty forthwith. The bail bond, if any, executed before the Sessions Court stands cancelled.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the Sessions Court, Kalpetta, forthwith for information.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top