Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN
Manisha – Appellant
Versus
Chandran Nair S/o Kunhiraman Nair – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the cheque dishonour proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding the conviction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. scope of revisional jurisdiction in criminal matters. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. application of statutory presumption under s. 139 of the negotiable instruments act. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final order and dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
1. Under challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the "N.I. Act").
2. The revision petitioner is the accused in S.T. No. 728/2006 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Hosdurg.
3. The case of the complainant is that the accused borrowed a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the complainant and, in discharge of the said liability, issued a cheque dated 03.03.2006 for the said amount in the complainant's favour. However, upon presentation, the cheque was dishonoured for the reason "funds insufficient." Thereafter, the complainant issued a statutory notice dated 24.03.2006 to the accused, informing him of the dishonour and dem
In a prosecution under Section 138 of the NI Act, once the execution of a cheque is admitted or proven, a presumption under Section 139 arises in favour of the complainant, and the burden shifts to t....
The High Court's revisional jurisdiction is supervisory in nature and limited to correcting legal improprieties or perversity in findings; it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence where trial and a....
In a Section 138 N.I. Act prosecution, once the execution of a cheque is proven, the statutory presumption under Section 139 shifts the burden to the accused; revisional courts will not interfere wit....
In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, once the execution of the cheque is proved, a statutory presumption under Section 139 arises in favor of the complainant, placing....
The statutory presumptions under Sections 138, 118, and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are critical in dishonour cases, determining the burden of proof.
In a revision petition against a conviction under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, the High Court will not reappreciate evidence unless the lower court's findings are perverse, and statutory presumptions....
The court's revisional jurisdiction is limited to correcting illegality and perversity; it cannot re-appreciate evidence as an appellate court, and the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
