Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN
Vijayalakshmi D/o Raman Nair – Appellant
Versus
Praveen C. S/o Purushothaman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of trial history and conviction under ni act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. submissions regarding evidence appraisal and cheque execution. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. scope of revisional jurisdiction and appreciation of evidence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. rebuttal of statutory presumption and modification of sentencing. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER :
1. Under challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short “N.I. Act”).
2. The revision petitioner is the accused in CC No.165/1999 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur.
3. The case of the complainant is that the accused borrowed a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- from the complainant, and in discharge of the said liability, the accused issued two cheques on the same day for Rs.1,50,000/- each, one dated 11.01.1999 and the other dated 28.01.1999, for the said amount in the complainant’s favour. However, upon presentation, the cheque was dishonoured, stating the reason “funds insufficient.” Thereafter, the complainant issued a statutory notice dated 18.02.1999 to the accused informing her of the dishonou
The High Court's revisional jurisdiction is supervisory in nature and limited to correcting legal improprieties or perversity in findings; it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence where trial and a....
In a prosecution under Section 138 of the NI Act, once the execution of a cheque is admitted or proven, a presumption under Section 139 arises in favour of the complainant, and the burden shifts to t....
In a Section 138 N.I. Act prosecution, once the execution of a cheque is proven, the statutory presumption under Section 139 shifts the burden to the accused; revisional courts will not interfere wit....
The court's revisional jurisdiction is limited to correcting illegality and perversity; it cannot re-appreciate evidence as an appellate court, and the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the ....
The statutory presumptions under Sections 138, 118, and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are critical in dishonour cases, determining the burden of proof.
In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, once the execution of the cheque is proved, a statutory presumption under Section 139 arises in favor of the complainant, placing....
In a revision petition against a conviction under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, the High Court will not reappreciate evidence unless the lower court's findings are perverse, and statutory presumptions....
A revisional court shall not interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless they suffer from perversity or illegality; furthermore, a notice returned as 'unclaimed' to the correct address is presu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
