SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 662

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J.
Jhabath Jabarali – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 2061 of 2026
Decided On : 20-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, Sri.Libin Stanley, Smt.Saipooja, Sri.Sadik Ismayil, Smt.R.Gayathri, Sri.M.Mahin Hamza, Shri.Alwin Joseph, Shri.Benson Ambrose
For the Respondent: Sri.M.C. Ashi, Sr. Pp.

An arrest is rendered illegal if the grounds of arrest are not communicated to the arrestee in writing, in a language they understand, within a reasonable time, specifically including required details such as contraband quantity in NDPS cases.

Headnote:The petitioner filed an application for regular bail under S.483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding an offence involving contraband under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner contended that his arrest was illegal due to a failure to communicate the grounds of arrest in writing, citing Art.22(1) of the Constitution and S.47 of the BNSS. The Court observed that statutory compliance regarding the communication of arrest grounds is mandatory and requires the grounds to be provided in writing in a language the arrestee understands. The core issues addressed were whether the failure to communicate written grounds of arrest renders an arrest illegal and whether such omission entitles the accused to bail. Referencing constitutional mandates and recent precedent, the Court reasoned that the right of an arrested person to be informed of the grounds of arrest is a fundamental right. It was established that in cases involving specific enactments like the NDPS Act, the specification of the quantity of contraband is essential to the validity of the arrest grounds as it determines the nature of the offence. The application for bail was allowed subject to conditions including the execution of a bond and cooperation with the ongoing investigation.

ORDER :

KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J.

This is the third bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.214/2025 of Mattancherry Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 22(c), 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, NDPS Act).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused No.1 was found in possession of 51.87 grams of MDMA on 16.06.2025 and investigation has revealed that the applicant conspired with the accused No.1 to possess the said contraband and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the requirement of informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 of the BNSS and inasmuch as the applicant was not furnished with the grounds of arrest, his arrest was illegal and is liable to be released on bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that all legal formalities were complied with in accordance with Chapter V of the BNSS at the time of the arrest of the applicant. It is further submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant and hence he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was arrested on 16.06.2025 and since then he is in judicial custody.

7. Though prima facie there are materials on record to connect the applicant with the crime, since the applicant has raised a question of absence of communication of the grounds of his arrest, let me consider the same.

8. Chapter V of BNSS, 2023 deals with the arrest of persons. Sub-section (1) of Section 35 of BNSS lists cases when police may arrest a person without a warrant. Section 47 of BNSS clearly states that every police officer or other person arresting any person without a warrant shall forthwith communicate to him full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested or other grounds for such arrest. Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India provides that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. Thus, the requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory statutory and constitutional requirement. Noncompliance with Article 22(1) of the Constitution will be a violation of the fundamental right of the accused guaranteed by the said Article. It will also amount to a violation of the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution.

9. The question whether failure to communicate written grounds of arrest would render the arrest illegal, necessitating the release of the accused, is no longer res integra. The Supreme Court in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and Others [(2024) 7 SCC 576], while dealing with Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, has held that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. It was further held that a copy of written grounds of arrest should be furnished to the arrested person as a matter of course and without exception. In Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi) [(2024) 8 SCC 254], while dealing with the offences under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act,1967 (for short, ‘UAPA’), it was held that any person arrested for an allegation of commission of offences under the provisions of UAPA or for that matter any other offence(s) has a fundamental and a statutory right to be informed about the grounds of arrest in writing and a copy of such written grounds of arrest has to be furnished t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top