SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 692

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J.
Manoranjan Tosha - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 2604 of 2026
Decided On : 21-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri.Sarath Babu Kottakkal, Sri.Sebastin,
For the Respondent: Sri.M.C. Ashi, Sr. Pp

An arrest is rendered illegal and the arrestee is entitled to bail if the grounds of arrest are not communicated in writing in a language the arrestee understands, per Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the BNSS.

Headnote:The petitioner, designated as the fifth accused in a criminal case involving the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The central point of contention was whether the failure to communicate the grounds of arrest to the accused in a language he understood violated constitutional and statutory mandates, specifically Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the BNSS. The Court observed that the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest is a fundamental and mandatory requirement, not merely a formality. The key issue was whether the arrest was rendered illegal due to non-compliance with the requirement to inform the accused of the grounds of arrest in a language they comprehend. Referencing Supreme Court precedents, the court reasoned that the failure to supply written grounds of arrest in a language understood by the arrestee vitiates the arrest process. It was determined that the communication provided exclusively in a language foreign to the accused failed to satisfy the legal, constitutional mandate. The application was allowed and the accused was granted bail subject to specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. procedural background and allegations under the ndps act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contentions regarding the legality of arrest for non-communication of grounds. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. binding principles on the mandatory requirement to communicate arrest grounds in the arrestee's language. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. application of the constitutional mandate to the present facts leading to grant of bail. (Para 14)

ORDER :

Kauser Edappagath, J.

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.5 in Crime No.1152/2025 of Chavakkad Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 31.12.2025 at around 07.20 a.m., accused Nos.1 to 4 were found in possession of 20.695 kilograms of Ganja in a car at Chavakkad Mini Civil Station bridge. The allegation against the applicant is that he provided the car which was in his possession to other accused persons for the crime and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Sarath Babu Kottakkal, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the requirement of informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 of the BNSS and inasmuch as the applicant was not furnished with the grounds of arrest, his arrest was illegal and is liable to be released on bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that all legal formalities were complied with in accordance with Chapter V of the at the time of the arrest of the applicant. It is further submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant and hence he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was arrested on 19.01.2026 and since then he is in judicial custody.

7. Though prima facie there are materials on record to connect the applicant with the crime, since the applicant has raised a question of absence of communication of the grounds of his arrest, let me consider the same.

8. Chapter V of BNSS, 2023 deals with the arrest of persons. Sub-section (1) of Section 35 of lists cases when police may arrest a person without a warrant. Section 47 of clearly states that every police officer or other person arresting any person without a warrant shall forthwith communicate to him full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested or other grounds for such arrest. Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India provides that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. Thus, the requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory statutory and constitutional requirement. Noncompliance with Article 22(1) of the Constitution will be a violation of the fundamental right of the accused guaranteed by the said Article. It will also amount to a violation of the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. 9. The question whether failure to communicate written grounds of arrest would render the arrest illegal, necessitating the release of the accused, is no longer res integra. The Supreme Court in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and Others [(2024) 7 SCC 576], while dealing with Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, has held that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. It was further held that a copy of written grounds of arrest should be furnished to the arrested person as a matter of course and without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top