IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J.
Manoranjan Tosha - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 2604 of 2026
Decided On : 21-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and allegations under the ndps act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding the legality of arrest for non-communication of grounds. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. binding principles on the mandatory requirement to communicate arrest grounds in the arrestee's language. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. application of the constitutional mandate to the present facts leading to grant of bail. (Para 14) |
ORDER :
Kauser Edappagath, J.
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.5 in Crime No.1152/2025 of Chavakkad Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 31.12.2025 at around 07.20 a.m., accused Nos.1 to 4 were found in possession of 20.695 kilograms of Ganja in a car at Chavakkad Mini Civil Station bridge. The allegation against the applicant is that he provided the car which was in his possession to other accused persons for the crime and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Sarath Babu Kottakkal, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the requirement of informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 of the BNSS and inasmuch as the applicant was not furnished with the grounds of arrest, his arrest was illegal and is liable to be released on bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that all legal formalities were complied with in accordance with Chapter V of the at the time of the arrest of the applicant. It is further submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant and hence he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The applicant was arrested on 19.01.2026 and since then he is in judicial custody.
7. Though prima facie there are materials on record to connect the applicant with the crime, since the applicant has raised a question of absence of communication of the grounds of his arrest, let me consider the same.
8. Chapter V of BNSS, 2023 deals with the arrest of persons. Sub-section (1) of Section 35 of lists cases when police may arrest a person without a warrant. Section 47 of clearly states that every police officer or other person arresting any person without a warrant shall forthwith communicate to him full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested or other grounds for such arrest. Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India provides that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. Thus, the requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory statutory and constitutional requirement. Noncompliance with Article 22(1) of the Constitution will be a violation of the fundamental right of the accused guaranteed by the said Article. It will also amount to a violation of the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. 9. The question whether failure to communicate written grounds of arrest would render the arrest illegal, necessitating the release of the accused, is no longer res integra. The Supreme Court in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and Others [(2024) 7 SCC 576], while dealing with Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, has held that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest. It was further held that a copy of written grounds of arrest should be furnished to the arrested person as a matter of course and without
An arrest is rendered illegal and the arrestee is entitled to bail if the grounds of arrest are not communicated in writing in a language the arrestee understands, per Article 22(1) of the Constituti....
The constitutional right to be informed of the grounds of arrest is mandatory, necessitating communication in writing or orally within a reasonable time before remand; failure to comply renders an ar....
The requirement to communicate grounds of arrest is mandatory and non-compliance may vitiate the legality of the arrest.
Non-communication of contraband quantity in arrest grounds violates Article 22(1), rendering NDPS arrest illegal, entitling bail.
Mandatory written communication of arrest grounds, including contraband quantity in NDPS cases, required; compliance proven, bail denied.
Failure to communicate contraband quantity in NDPS arrest grounds violates Article 22(1), rendering arrest illegal and entitling bail.
The mandatory requirement to inform an arrestee of the grounds for arrest under Article 22(1) of the Constitution is essential for any arrest to be lawful.
(1) Bail – Filing of charge-sheet and cognizance of order cannot validate an unconstitutional arrest – Constitutional requirement of informing arrestee of grounds of arrest is mandatory.(2) Dictum la....
The failure to communicate the grounds of arrest in writing to the arrestee, in accordance with Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the BNSS, renders the arrest and subsequent remand ....
Failure to inform an arrestee of the grounds for arrest violates constitutional rights, rendering the arrest illegal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.