SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 830

AJAY RASTOGI
Prithvi Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mani Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.C. Joshi, for the Petitioner.
Mr.R.B. Mathur, for the Respondents.

Judgment

Ajay Rastogi, J.-These two writ petitions having been filed one and the same petitioner, since involve common question of law and facts, at joint request of both the parties, have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. In CWP No. 4965/93 Prithvi Singh, petitioner, has challenged order:-

(1) dated 12.01.1984 (Exhibit-16), whereby he has been discharged from service in an inquiry under Rule 16 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958 ("CCA Rules"), in charge-sheet dated 09.06.1981(Exhibit 4);

(2) dated 011.1986 (Exhibit-19) whereby revision petition under Rule 32 of CCA Rules was rejected as time barred;

(3) dated 31.05.1990 (Exhibit-28) whereby review petition was also dismissed.

3. In CWP No. 5761/92 petitioner has challenged orders:-

(1) dated 13.01.1984 (Exhibit-3) passed in charge-sheet dated 04.07.1981 under Rule 16 of CCA Rules, whereby he has been held guilty of all charges and inflicted with penalty of discharge from service but ordered that since he has already been discharged from service vide order dated 12.01.1984, so in case of reinstatement in appeal, then order of discharge would come into force.
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top