KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Alwar Prakashan – Appellant
Versus
K. K. Shrimal – Respondent
Khem Chand Sharma, J.- Since, common question of law and facts are involved in all these appeals filed by the defendants appellants arising out of the orders allowing the applications filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, CPC as also the applications filed under Order 38 Rule 5, CPC, therefore, they are being decided by this common Judgment .
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that plaintiffs filed civil suits for recovery of loan amount against the defendants. Alongwith the suits, the plaintiffs filed applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, CPC, alleging therein that the defendants with a view to defrauding the creditors intend or threaten to dispose of the property and prayed to restrain the defendants from selling, mortgaging or alienating the property. The plaintiffs also filed applications under Order 38 Rule 5, CPC, alleging therein that the defendants with intent to obstruct and delay the execution of decree that may be passed against them are about to dispose of the property mentioned in the applications. The learned trial Court, having found prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss in favour of the plaintiffs allowe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.