GOVIND MATHUR
Anand Bardwa – Appellant
Versus
Raj. Financial Corpn. – Respondent
Govind Mathur, J.- These three petitions are based on common facts and the question required to be decided is also similar, therefore, the same are heard and decided by a common order. For convenience the facts of
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3050/2005 are taken into consideration.
2. By this petition an appropriate writ, order or direction is sought by the petitioner to quash the order dated 28.03.2005 passed by the Executive Director, Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation"); the notice dated 25.04.2005 issued by the Manager (Branch), Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Kota and the order dated 06.05.2005 passed by the Manager, Rajasthan Financial Corporation, Kota.
.3. By order dated 28.03.2005 the respondent Corporation withdrew the directions issued by a letter dated 25.02.2005 pertaining to allotment of land acquired from RIICO by the Corporation. By notice dated 25.04.20
.the Manager of Kota Branch of the Corporation sought explanation from the petitioner as to why the allotment of land made in his favour by letter dated 11.03.2005 be not withdrawn/cancelled being not legal. By order dated 06.05.2005 the Manger of the Corpor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.