SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 237

K.S.RATHORE
Rahul Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K. Khetan, for the Appellant
Rizwan Ali, Advocate and Dinesh Kala, for the Respondents

Judgment

K.S. Rathore, J.-The petitioner preferred this revision petition under Section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, against the order dated September 11, 2001, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Communal Riots) Mini Secretariat, Jaipur City, Jaipur in criminal complaint No. 401 of 2001 (Mrs. Renu Gupta vs. Rahul Bhatia). This revision petition comes up before this Court on October 1, 2001. This Court vide order dated October 1, 2001, on the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, treated this revision petition as a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was working as a sub-broker in the share market of Jaipur and was managing his own office in 218, Shop No. 5, Ramgali No. 1, Raja Park, Jaipur in the name and style of Vinayak Investments, Jaipur. The petitioner paid a sum of Rs. 62,000 by account payee cheques to the complainant against the amount due. Though the complainant admits the aforesaid amount which was paid through account payee cheques, it is not disclosed by the complainant in her statement on which date, she paid Rs. 1 lakh to
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top