Judgment Inder Sen Israni, J.-Both the revisions arise out of the same order dt. 7th Oct., 1986 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dholpur upholding the orders dt. 20-5-1986 passed in Civil Case No. 11/84 and 9/84. Since common point oflaw is involved in both the petitions, therefore, they are disposed of by this single order.

2. The contention oflearned counsel Shri B. K. Sharma appearing for the petitioners is that the non-petitioner tenant has not complied with the provisions of Section 13(4) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), inasmuch as he has failed to deposit in Court or to pay to the landlord rent month by month by 15th of each succeeding month or within such further time, not exceeding 15 days, as may be extended by the Court, at the monthly rate at which the rent was determined by the Court under Sub-section (3) of Section 13 of the Act. He has pointed out that according to the provisions of Sub-section (4) of Section 13 of the Act, the non-petitioner has to deposit the rent month by month before 15 of the succeeding month, but in the present case the non-petitioner tenant has deposited

Click Here to Read the rest of this document