V.P.TYAGI, M.L.SHRIMAL
Rajasthan Udyog – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. By a notification dated March 13, 1973 the respondent No. 1, the State of Rajasthan under Section 4 (1) of the Act No. XXIV of 1953 proclaimed that the lands specified in the schedule attached to the said notification were needed or likely to be needed for public purpose, that is, for General Engineering Works, Bharatpur. The notification further stated that under Section 4 (1) of the Act No. XXIV of 1953 the Government was pleased to authorise the Tehsildar, Bharatpur, to discharge the functions envisaged by Section 4 (1) and submit a report under Section 4 (4) of the Act No. XXIV of 1953. The respondent No. 3, Land Acquisition Officer (Sub-di
Cases Referred : Gyan Devi vs. The State of Rajasthan
Shyam Behari vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Mysore vs. Abdul Razak
Munshi Singh vs. Union of India
Gopal Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
R.L. Arora vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of West Bengal vs. P.N. Talukdar
R.L. Arora vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.