SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Raj) 5

KAN SINGH
Girdharilal – Appellant
Versus
Mahadevi Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearance :
H.M. Lodha, for the Appellant
D.P. Gupta, Advocate along with M.C. Rastogi, for the Respondents

Judgment Kan Singh, J.-This is a defendant’s revision and is directed against an appellate order of District Judge, Alwar dated 8-5-67 and arises out of an application for grant of a temporary injunction pendente lite by the plaintiff-respondent.

2. Plaintiff Smt. Mahadevi and defendant Girdharilal are neighbours and have their houses adjacent to each other in the city of Alwar. In his house the defendant had first established a flour mill in March, 1965 and then some time in the last week of Feburary, 1967 he also established an oil mill consisting of a pair of’Kolhus.’ This led the plaintiff to bring a suit for a permanent injunction against the defendant for restraining him from working his flour mill as well as the oil mill. It was averred by the plaintiff that the running of the two mills was a cause of nuisance to her. According to her, as a result of the working of the two mills her house shakes and as a result of the shaking a crack has also been caused in that house. It was also alleged that the plaintiff was a heart patient and as a result of the thunderous noise created by the running of the two mills her ailment was aggravated. Also on account of the running of the flou






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top